Whatever side of the political divide you are on, it’s refreshing to get an honest assessment that our public finances are not in a healthy state. Much better than the previous pretence that all was well.
The helicopter contract was already cancelled. The 'riots' were not racist. He didn't 'end the riots'. There were no more protests planned, just some fake news from the left. The binning of the Rwanda plan with no alternative in place increase illegal migration. The others were projects set by the tories. So basically, you are confirming Starmer is a lying bag of ****e, which you already knew because you will have seen the replies to the original message, which is why you only posted the image. You are ****ing hopeless at this.
The lies in that speech were off the scale. It was written to fool the already conned and thick ****s that conflate illegal and uncontrolled migration with the border controls most sane people see as essential.
Oh look, here's proof of just one of Starmer's big lies today. The media might eventually get him to prove his claims about this mythical far right he sees everywhere. He has no idea what political leanings (if any) those convicted have. As I said, being weak and dishonest is something some people see as good character traits.
Do you believe showing you as a hopeless liar posting misinformation yet again somehow suggests a person is triggered? It's just an easy opportunity to show how weak your favoured ideology is, and confirms that you lot have no credible arguments.
The letter is dated 29th July and mentions discussions the week before, which yes would be under the current government from 5th July onwards, BUT they weren't in power back in March, so how would Starmer have known about it if the Tories had kept stumm, which at a guess they probably did. Is there any evidence that shows that Starmer knew about it before the election, because to me, that don't seem like the evidence that is being claimed, unless I'm missing something - if it was general knowledge that our economy had a blackhole of £22B surely the press would have been all over it, way before the election?
