Having the game stopped for 10 minutes so some ****ing idiots can review video footage 10,000 times then issue the wrong call 50% of the time is funny?
Sure you are all over it tho. edit….. https://twitter.com/skysportsnews/status/1798679224175190334?s=46&t=GjXW4PhG0s7kgSMl8GkTkw
Was barely worth a response. Spurs do it the right way, build and revenue and blah ****ing blah... then win nowt apart from a prize for righteousness and doing things the Levy way. We're also doing it the right way, but mainly cos we're forced. We've zero debt, have ambitious owners that would back us and while we ARE building infrastructure and growing revenues, we're only being delayed with progress with PSR because the "big clubs" are **** scared of becoming less relevant short term. It's all cyclical. But yeah, otherwise, good points well made.
Does that mean City can spend more, hope so, although we need a trigger alert warning button on this forum first.
There's been a few proposed but I think this is the really weird one where clubs can spend 10 x the amount the bottom club earns in revenue or something.... I find this interesting given it comes days after city aim their tanks at the rules.
Does this still mean that Newcastle and Leicester will be selling to meet PSR rules. Who Leicester will be able to sell is beyond me
Looking at the England squad playing 3 at the back with Stones stepping into midfield could give you a ****ing superb team on the pitch. No way Gareth is that smart though.
