The country that invaded Ukraine twice are the innocent ones. I'm not going to bother with this anymore. Your usual tactic of boring people to death with complete nonsense is ****ing painful.
The 14000 was post war Yes I know what Russia is doing it's aim is to kill Ukrainian soldiers. Its not about occupation as you think but the denazification of Ukraine - which really means the end of Ukraine as a military threat It's why every seige becomes a meat grinder for the UAF who rush reservists into kill zones
Innocent ffs Grow up This is Geopolitics on a massive scale where NATO use Ukraine to weaken Russia and Russia responds You honestly think the two most corrupt countries in Europe have a goodies and baddies side It's not about morals it's about the upper hand and Ukraine in the battfiled NATO chose There were multiple opportunities to stop this It's nothing like a racist occupation with surprise counter attacks and nutcase fanatics going full genocide Everyone knew what they were doing and accepted what would happen to Ukraine
I'd say Sunak came out ahead on the ITV debate. I think the presenter was charitable to Starmer, cutting him off rather than let him to continue to waffle and show he has no plan for the future. He just seems to think saying 'vote for me, I'm not him' is a credible argument. No wonder he's popular with the lefties on here. I don't think Sunak saying 'you know what you get with me' is the vote winner he seems to think it is either. I don't think it matters, because I can't see people changing their opinions on either of them before the election now anyway.
I thought they were both ****e and the host had very little control over the whole debate. The fact that none of them would have the balls to shag Stormy Daniels just shows that they are a couple of ****s.
Neither of them looked like someone you'd want as a leader did they? Them, Trump, Biden are just proof that politicians aren't running anything, so getting all loyal and devoted to any of them is the action of fools, especially if it's only due to the colour of their rosette, when the historic meanings of them is long dead.
Just remind us when Nigel Farage was ever on the ‘Westminster expense account bandwagon’? He has never been elected to Parliament. Scottish born Galloway got the Muslims in Rochdale to vote for him on a pro-Palestinian terrorist ticket, so he could legitimately claim expenses.
I cannot see anyone selling milkshakes so this must be fake news... please log in to view this image
Why did ITV bother with an election debate when neither of the two leaders involved has actually published a Manifesto yet? Officially neither of them has any policies, just soundbites. From reports it just ended up a shouting match and one of these dolts will be Prime Minister on July the Fifth. All Starmer has had for the last two years is soundbites. The working class man with a £2m house and a big fat pension written into law is as duplicitous as any politician currently active. He has already reneged on all of his commitments that he made to get elected as Labour leader and changes his mind about anything he says he is going to do within days of saying it. Sunak is an irrelevance. Everyone knows that his party is going to crash and even his own party members did not vote for him to be Prime Minister so he cannot claim any political legitimacy. Neither leader is prepared to tell anyone what they actually intend doing, just mudslinging about how bad the other one will be in office. It does not occur to Labour that the reason they have not been in power for 14 years is because of the unelectable leaders that they kept offering as an alternative to the Conservatives.
Genghis Khan's decree exempting Buddhists (toyin), Christians (erke'üd), Taoists (xiansheng) and Muslims (dashmad) from tax duties were continued by his successors until the end of the Yuan dynasty in 1368 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_Mongol_Empire
