New Head Coach

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Personally I think he was always the wrong choice based on his record. He had never managed a full season and was sacked with Rangers behind St.Mirren in the league.

Couldn't care less where he's from or his accent - he was never going to succeed due to being a poor manager. That's why a lot of support was negative towards the appointment. Speakman thought he knew best - he couldn't have got it more wrong.

Fast forward and we have the same football director having a major say in selecting the next head coach along with his failure of a mate who also has done nowt in the game at a high level. (excepting 2 disastrous temporary spells as caretaker).

This is concerning because it screams mediocrity and jobs for the boys or yes men who will work with the current coaches doesn't fill me with confidence.
I think the point some are trying to make is some did judge him on the way he spoke and attacked his appearance before he even managed a game for us.

I was very vocal about not wanting him, due to his lack of playing identity at rangers - imo good coaches will have their teams playing a set way that is easy to identity but couldnt with him

Some wrote him off because the way he talked tho

Beale was a shocking appointment, i said at the time i didnt agree with it and i wanted to be proved wrong. Some almost felt like no matter what he did they wouldnt like him because of the way he talked or how he looked - thats poor imo (however each to their own)

Anyway beale is in the past

I think the club are doing the right thing taking there time on this one as they MUST nail it
 
I dont like the training ground guru article. I realise it is a short piece and I hope there is more to what I can infer.

Players playing in areas of the pitch, rather than positions, isnt massively helpful in my opinion. Nor is the concept of playing where the space is. In my opinion space is the most important thing in the game other than the ball. But there is bad space and good space. Good space is generally space you create for yourself by manipulating the ball of the opposition. This often means actually playing in really tight spaces, in order to negate opposition players and find a pocket of space that results. One of our major problems in the first half of this season was teams being disciplined and banking two lines and blocking all good space. Against bad sides you can still find space because they lack discipline across the 11. But against decent teams it doesnt work. So you need to manufacture space. Dan Neil is very good at it, he will attract a man to come close then receive it and either pop it round him in a 1-2 or roll him. Clarke is another who sucks players in and then beats them and has opened space. If you are an elite side against a weak side, like England U21s often are space will exist and good players will drift into it. Foden is a master for Man City. The likes of Bernardo and De Bruyne move so well spaces pop up, or Haaland makes the move leaves a space and Foden is there. Again though this is elite players working in tandem. Do we have that in this league? No is my opinion, even Leicester couldnt play in that way every week.

I think Carsley might struggle to implement those ideas in what right now is a lower mid table side. We need to be prepared, I think, to earn game domination from an intense out of possession game and a high tempo in game play. The Mowbray style of high tempo in game play was good. Can we get someone in who can replicate that and add to it with more possession when in front, game control.
Interesting. I see what you're saying. I think what drew my interest was the aspect of him looking at things in a different way- I always find that interesting. I took it more as he was selecting players on how they fitted together but, admittedly, I could have misunderstood it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FellTop
I dont like the training ground guru article. I realise it is a short piece and I hope there is more to what I can infer.

Players playing in areas of the pitch, rather than positions, isnt massively helpful in my opinion. Nor is the concept of playing where the space is. In my opinion space is the most important thing in the game other than the ball. But there is bad space and good space. Good space is generally space you create for yourself by manipulating the ball of the opposition. This often means actually playing in really tight spaces, in order to negate opposition players and find a pocket of space that results. One of our major problems in the first half of this season was teams being disciplined and banking two lines and blocking all good space. Against bad sides you can still find space because they lack discipline across the 11. But against decent teams it doesnt work. So you need to manufacture space. Dan Neil is very good at it, he will attract a man to come close then receive it and either pop it round him in a 1-2 or roll him. Clarke is another who sucks players in and then beats them and has opened space. If you are an elite side against a weak side, like England U21s often are space will exist and good players will drift into it. Foden is a master for Man City. The likes of Bernardo and De Bruyne move so well spaces pop up, or Haaland makes the move leaves a space and Foden is there. Again though this is elite players working in tandem. Do we have that in this league? No is my opinion, even Leicester couldnt play in that way every week.

I think Carsley might struggle to implement those ideas in what right now is a lower mid table side. We need to be prepared, I think, to earn game domination from an intense out of possession game and a high tempo in game play. The Mowbray style of high tempo in game play was good. Can we get someone in who can replicate that and add to it with more possession when in front, game control.
Great post mate

The last paragraph is spot on - heres hoping we find someone that can give us that type of team
 
  • Like
Reactions: FellTop
Expressing doubts, as a fan, about a prospective managerial appointment is one thing, and perfectly normal.

As a fan, not giving a new manager of the club a chance and being instantly negative towards him because you wouldn't have chosen him is not acceptable.

Verbally attacking a man for his accent and his appearance, just because you don't think he is a good football manager, is never acceptable.

Expecting people to treat other people with respect and dignity is always acceptable.

The truth is, Beale wasn't accepted and his behaviour only became more erratic as the pressure from fans became more unreasonable. He was never given the chance to prove otherwise and the negativity surrounding his appointment became a self-fulfilling prophecy.
This all day good post
 
They aren’t fans.
Well they will tell you that they are. I don’t get this it’s the fans fault, as I said not one player has stood up for Beale, and there was reports of unrest. How about apportioning the blame to the players and the staff? It’s not as if a fan shouting about Beales mole made us lose away at Huddersfield
I get that it’s unnecessary but has less bearing on the results than Beales tactics and the players unable to respond to them
 
Well they will tell you that they are. I don’t get this it’s the fans fault, as I said not one player has stood up for Beale, and there was reports of unrest. How about apportioning the blame to the players and the staff? It’s not as if a fan shouting about Beales mole made us lose away at Huddersfield
I get that it’s unnecessary but has less bearing on the results than Beales tactics and the players unable to respond to them
They can tell me what they want, but I just see 3 year old children stamping their feet in a supermarket.
 
Maybe because the manager was being attacked none stop before he even started, just a thought.
Attacked, haway man, there were no dissenting voices when he was introduced at the SoL, he applauded the fans for his nieces tribute later on. Like I said not one player has come out and defended him. People are allowed to admit they were wrong about him, they don’t have to perpetuate the story that a few fans crying about his accent actually made him a **** head coach.