It would more likely be that the compensation is reduced by the value of any future contract, but still begs the question as to why take a job to just get paid the same.
When Marsch was at Leeds and Andy Dawson was the interim manage I spent a little time looking at his career and thought he would fit the bill for me. But then we appointed LIam and late Marsch was sacked. Not sure he would be on Acuns short list though. Seems Marsch is a little like Graham Potter comes from a college/University background, well educated not a former professional soccer player considers all aspects of the game not just what happens on the field etc.,
Talksport on Blunder might be worth a listen tonight....For a change...No doubt they'll kick off with an in-depth assessment of the upheaval at Hull FC, then casually refer to City looking for a new boss! Come on..Its Blunder...ain't it!
It doesnt stop. That is the whole point. I understand that Chelsea agreed a severance package but if they hadnt they would have had to top up his wages like Chelsea did with other managers and same with Man Utd.
Yes, some were decent on an individual level, but too many were total wastes of a wage, several of whom are still on the books now, leading to us sitting in the championship bottom 3 when Rosenior arrived despite spending quite a lot on wages. There was clearly no recruitment strategy beyond just signing players familiar to our ownership on big money.
Maybe so, but he's a businessman. I doubt he'd walk away from money. I think it's more down to the fact play offs weren't secured.
coyle, slater, delap, philo, greaves all had their best seasons of their careers rosies great at improving players
