What I said was Bournemouth are in a better place than when he left mate. They were relegated when he left and have been promoted, so it's a fact. Steve Bruce got Hull promoted.
I don’t need that kind of thing pointing out you know full well what I mean. You call Longstaff at every possible opportunity and pick him out like last night when no one was great and some worse and you stated he did nothing last night which was factually incorrect but as usual you had to pick on him
I never said he was right, I pointed out he had reason and is in a better position than you to gauge the young players whilst also having his head on the block as opposed to someone commenting online.
They got promoted (with premier league money) and …….. Howe got them promoted three divisions without that. Some ale house manager that.
That’s factually true to be fair but wasn’t what you were inferring. As for your mate Bruce he didn’t bring Hull up 3 divisions
It is actually that's why I said it... a factual comment.. I can't infer something different in a fact. That would be saying something completely different.
I don't hate you it's absolutely fine to debate without that. I just know I dont dislike Longstaff personally why would I he is clearly a very nice lad. I think he's out of his depth though and being pick of favouritism....that's my view inwont change it.... it's not right what you said hence I've explained why.
You can imagine I have ... why would I use a fact that isn't what I mean I would just say the thing you think I said surely.
How they are a better side with more money after recovering come on mate. They've improved it really that simple.... they got relegated amd are now much better off on and off the pitch than when Howe left.
I doubt he’s being picked because Howe knows his dad. If you’re just being subjective why is it always Longstaff you pick out?
Again, if you always just pick on one player you’re not being subjective you clearly have something against him
