Rangers v Celtic

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
yous are the ones getting it called off, dundee have been happy to play
The ref called it off Eddie. That's how pitch inspections work. Ref goes on the pitch, checks it out, deems it playable or unplayable.

You should know this tbh.
 
Yorkshire Whistler Verdict

Initial on field decision: Silva is cautioned for simulation but after VAR review, this caution is rescinded and a penalty awarded for the foul.


An interesting incident to say the least here. Silva looks to take on the Celtic defender. In real time Johnston looks to have played the ball first before Silva’s thigh connects with Johnston’s trailing right leg that is extended as part of the initial block. Silva goes to ground quite easily and the on field referee believes this is an act of simulation and cautions Silva for unsporting behaviour.

Upon watching the VAR clip, I found it very surprising that the on-field referee was not shown the initial touch that Johnston got the ball first. This makes me question did the referee have all the relevant information provided to him at the time of the review.

From the media’s replay footage Johnston clearly contacts the ball first and any secondary contact between the two players is minimal and what I would class in this particular incident as natural player momentum/expected contact. I believe you can argue a case that Silva feels this contact and goes to ground as many players do, and so it is not an act of simulation as such and that the caution is harsh.

But I cannot understand how this decision is over turned as Johnston clearly makes contact with the ball first with his right foot.

Verdict: INCORRECT DECISION. Initial on field decision to not penalise the tackle was correct. No foul committed.

OO FF TT YY
 
Yorkshire Whistler Verdict

Initial on field decision: Silva is cautioned for simulation but after VAR review, this caution is rescinded and a penalty awarded for the foul.


An interesting incident to say the least here. Silva looks to take on the Celtic defender. In real time Johnston looks to have played the ball first before Silva’s thigh connects with Johnston’s trailing right leg that is extended as part of the initial block. Silva goes to ground quite easily and the on field referee believes this is an act of simulation and cautions Silva for unsporting behaviour.

Upon watching the VAR clip, I found it very surprising that the on-field referee was not shown the initial touch that Johnston got the ball first. This makes me question did the referee have all the relevant information provided to him at the time of the review.

From the media’s replay footage Johnston clearly contacts the ball first and any secondary contact between the two players is minimal and what I would class in this particular incident as natural player momentum/expected contact. I believe you can argue a case that Silva feels this contact and goes to ground as many players do, and so it is not an act of simulation as such and that the caution is harsh.

But I cannot understand how this decision is over turned as Johnston clearly makes contact with the ball first with his right foot.

Verdict: INCORRECT DECISION. Initial on field decision to not penalise the tackle was correct. No foul committed.

OO FF TT YY
Well that’s about 20-1 mate

just another 19 to draw level