Elio de angelis -- the forgotten gem ?

And I'm still waiting for you to post something non antagonistic, constructive and objective... So I guess we'll both be waiting. Tick tock!

Btw... I'll bet my left kidney you say "Tick Tock" again... Please don't disapoint.

Anyway, enough feeding the troll for one night. Going to go relax with the wife and kids.

N'NIGHT!!!


TICK TOCK!

 

now now RI --

lets not get into the realm of silly personal insults just because you cannot get the better of me , that is only going to destroy the forum for everybody on here --

lets just stick to formula 1 related topics --

 

what was exactly wrong with my de angelis topic than bhaji --

come on be specific as it seems to have angered you so much --

 

I'm not remotely angry at all. Why are you so upset that I question it? It's only my opinion after all. I thought you advocated the expression of opinion.

 

you were the one that critisized my topic earlier on this evening hinting -- as you critisized it clearly it has angered you in some way --

what exactly about my topic has angered you enough to critisize it in the first place --

 

I don't recall criticizing your topic. I did however question it's motive. I think you may have a small problem with comprehension.

In addition, I think you lack intuition... I'm not even remotely angry. In fact I'm quite calm. You seem to want me to be angry though. Why would that be? I thought we were all "buds" here.

You're allowed to disagree with my analysis of your topic... It's just my opinion.

"Tick tock"

 

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha…



I cannot believe what has happened since I left this discussion. It is hilarious; almost beyond belief!

 

there you go then bhaji as you have difficulty in remembering exactly what your intial post was this evening -

you saw fit to launch an unprovoked attack on me and my topic ---

as i said what exactly was wrong with my harlmless topic about de angelis in the first place that you felt the need to ridicule me and the topic --

dont hide from the question --man up and be specific and explain your unprovoked attack and the need to start causing trouble this evening --

 

Well it at least made me chuckle... I did try to resist, I really did... I just gave in to temptation. I have sinned, and tomorrow I shall confess.

 

I am waiting. Tick, tock, tick, tock…

 

I am still waiting! Tick, tock, tick, tock tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock…

 

fully agree cc -- pitifull that people still have a problem with a harmless elio de angelis topic --

- maybe people should try creating a topic of there own for once instead of critisizing other peoples attempts -

 

Times up Bhaji!

You lose. Me not waiting no more! Me not playing. You not play by tick tock rules!

AAGH BLAST! I lose! This is an edit because you beat me as I typed. You good tick tock player…

 

I think you're a tad fragile if you see that as ridicule. That is my analysis and opinion of your initial post. Am I not allowed that grace? Can you not handle that? If I wanted to ridicule you... You'd get way more than that me laddie!

*see what I did there?*

Also... I make no excuse for my provocation... Fully intended.

 

see you are still not man enough to explain specifically -- note the word specifically what it is you dont like about my topic -

now come on bhaji -- man up and be specific -- what is it exactly that you dont like about my topic that your saw fit to launch an unprovoked attack on myself and my topic this evening

--now come on " laddie " can you man up and be specific -

 

Man enough? You're the one bent out of shape here. What of my analysis are you struggling with? Point it out and I'll explain the bits you have problems understanding.

 

there you go the bhaji --

if my topic was not about de angelis what exactly was it about about then ,

what have i said about mansell that has offended you so much to ridicule my topic and call me silly names in the process --

is that clear enough for you -- now come on man up and tell me specifically what you find so offensive about my harmless topic about a driver ( de angelis ) that i admired during my youth -

 

You haven't pointed out which part you don't understand. I thought you were intelligent. If I have to break it down for you, we could ne here for weeks. *or until the thread gets shut*.

I'm pretty sure you understand exactly what I mean... but if you want to continue to play the idiot, then so be it. But let's face it.. you don't need my help.

So come on... man up, what don't you understand?

*excuse this bollocks people...but the sooner this clown gets the message and fooks off, the better... before the decent posters of this board all vanish*

Was the above clear enough for you? probably not...

 

how many times to you want me to explain it to you , or are you purposely avoiding giving me a specific answer - the post above was your INITIAL post that started all this bollocks this evening --- read it before you reply back to me

what is my topic about if it is not about de angelis ( you seem to think it is about something else ) ---- are you clear on that question -

and exactly what is it i have said about mansell in my topic that is not relevent to the topic that has offended you so much that you have to ridicule my topic and call me silly names in the process ( troll )--- are you clear on that -

now bhaji -- i cannot put it any clearer than that --

to repeat -- are you crystal clear on those two questions --- do you want me to repeat them to you for the 5th time or have you at last managed to comphrehend what i am saying and are you able to give me a specific answer to draw an end to this bollocks -