He clearly says we have to trade star players and it's just common knowledge they'll cash in on players. I notice you ignored the aspect of the clause I just mentioned ,but that means the club won't have any say basically if Guimaraes wants to go. I'm not typing **** I'm afraid that's you because you're saying it's all click bait and hysteria ( one of Bruces favourite words) when it's not it's how football clubs are run.
And why you keep mentioning Bruce and why you keep moving the goalposts. Yeah, honesty and mental gymnastics.
At no point have they said they need to sell this summer. At no point has he mentioned names. I did mention the clause in an earlier comment when I said if Bruno wishes to leave then that's on the player. They're sure as hell no hawking him around.
Let's not forget this entire discussion has come around because I said isak is not available often enough and if someone pays 100 million great, however it's far more likely someone will trigger Guimaraes's clause and that'll mean Newcastle don't need to sell anyone else. Trading is going to be part of reality and sponsorship deal won't change that mate, so let's just accept I'm being realistic and let's not pretend Eales hasn't told us when a one of out top players is sold. BTW he also says we are trying to win a pot in 5 years which will be 9 years to early for my prediction.
You just mentioned him and Bruce did fine for two seasons all things considered...that's me being honest over my emotional likes and dislikes of a manager.
Your still changing position of goal posts. At no point have I said we won't sell players. What I said was we don't need to sell players this summer for financial reasons or for PSR. The sponsorship does deal with that this summer. Sela, Adidas and Champions league is £100m that was not in this year's accounts. That is £500m on 5 year amortization deals. This is the point I'm making. If someone triggers Bruno's clause and he want's to move then crack on. In defence of Isak however, I'd have to question if you thought Shearer was made of Balsa wood because he used to miss way more games than Isak has.
I never said you it's you making a claim it's hysteria and I advised you otherwise. Isak isn't shearer far from it.
Wonder how shearer would do in today’s game. He would get more protection and possibly be less injured. But at the same time he wasn’t that technical.
I’m focusing on Shearer. And Haaland is similar in terms of his play style. So yes maybe Shearer would score even more goals with the protection he would now have.
I actually think Shearer is far more technical than you give him credit for. Remember all those world class crosses he used to put in as well.
His main strengths for me were his finishing and his power. He couldn’t dribble past anyone. He wasn’t very fast. He couldn’t run with the ball.
How do you figure he would get more protection now? I keep reading that Howe and our medical team purposely injure our players.
hold on, you said he is always injured and not that good. So you think an elite club will fork out top money for him? mum selling some magic beans if you are interested.
