If he's was available even half a season he'd be worth more, but the reality is he's made of balsa wood on a good day.
I am imo as fair as anyone on here and the Joelinton thread is conclusive. I see plenty going after players other than the popular players. Isak isn't available enough, he lacks the required genetics regardless of how good he can be on the odd occasion he's even available.. I'm really not after players on a favouritism basis like that mass majority.
Because there's always clubs out there willing to pay 35 million for Andy Carroll. If Newcastle can rip someone off and get 2 or 3 players that can play and are available it's a win win.
You know how this works. You only get the difference between purchase and sale price as ‘money’ to spend if you were over spent in that period. So if he cost £60m and you…..you know what. Yeah.
40 million is a good profit regardless and needs must. I don't think we'll get an decent money for another player. Botman has had his career ruined through club negligence and Joelinton is going to go on a free. Of course I'd love to sell longstaff that would be ideal...pure profit for an absolutely dreadful player.
I wish people could understand accounts before getting hysterical and making stuff up. Adidas, Sela and Champions league money all comes in at end of season, in time for transfer window. No need to sell anyone unless they ask to leave.
Eales basically explained this to us all and it's not a case of hysteria it's a case of common sense which is that Newcastle will have to trade plus there's clauses and players that will choose trophies over cup runs for the next few years.
No he didn't, click bait merchants have jumped on him saying all big clubs have to sell big players at some point in time. At no point did he say we need to sell anyone this year. Go check before typing ****e.
