1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Premier League admits VAR's a bit ****...

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by originallambrettaman, Feb 8, 2024.

  1. Drew

    Drew Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,366
    Likes Received:
    4,635
    I guess now they’ve got the added step of ‘they had two chances to get it right and still failed!’
     
    #21
    dennisboothstash likes this.
  2. dennisboothstash

    dennisboothstash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    23,307
    Likes Received:
    37,974
    True.
    Can argue about the refs decision and the VAR too now.
     
    #22
  3. Ernie Shackleton

    Ernie Shackleton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    13,232
    Likes Received:
    25,070
    You can boil it down to this:

    VAR was brought in to ensure that refereeing mistakes do not happen.

    VAR does not ensure that refereeing mistakes do not happen.


    The justification arguments now seem to be around the fact that less mistakes happen under VAR.

    You have to balance that against the fact that VAR has introduced a level of absurd pedantry into the game (ridiculous interpretations of the handball rule, measuring offsides in millimetres), as well as the soul destroying breaks in the game and decide whether VAR has improved or worsened the game overall.


    FWIW I'm definitely in the latter camp.
     
    #23
  4. Drew

    Drew Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,366
    Likes Received:
    4,635
    Im in the latter camp too. I’d rather an imperfect game than a game trying to be perfect being imperfect.
     
    #24
  5. AlRawdah

    AlRawdah Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2014
    Messages:
    8,990
    Likes Received:
    10,206
    I would actually keep VAR for offsides, they are relatively mechanistic to judge although they do seem to take an age. I'd bin it for fouls, handballs, penalties and all the other stuff though, they are pure matters of judgement. Yes that means a few poor decisions will creep in and a few dives will yield penalties - but as Ernie suggests, that's happening anyway with VAR.

    Problem is, the cost of installing and staffing VAR is such that having it just to determine 3-4 tight offside calls per match is probably prohibitive.

    What a mess. Just ****can it.
     
    #25
    HHH, PLT, taigers and 2 others like this.
  6. balkan tiger

    balkan tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Messages:
    14,604
    Likes Received:
    12,524
    Wonder why they have never considered more referees or linesmen? A ref in each half, two linesmen each side.

    Saying that many times something happens right in front of a linesman and they don't react seemingly leaving it to the referee to make the decision.
     
    #26
    dennisboothstash likes this.

  7. Cambstiger

    Cambstiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    862
    Likes Received:
    922
    They aren’t even called linesmen anymore, they are called referee’s assistants, but they do **** all assisting, just wait for the ref to make a decision and then wave a flag.
     
    #27
  8. TigerMarv

    TigerMarv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    VAR should be so simple.
    It's only to override clear and obvious errors therefore there should be a time limit if VAR can't make a decision in the time limit then it isn't clear and obvious and you stuck with the on field decision if if technical not right
     
    #28
  9. The Compositor

    The Compositor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2019
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    502
    Thierry Henry has a lot to answer for!
     
    #29
    Evington likes this.
  10. Plum

    Plum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    16,747
    Likes Received:
    13,217
    Agree. 30 secs max.
     
    #30
  11. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    27,066
    Likes Received:
    17,974
    UEFA did do that for a bit. With those extra officials behind the goal line. Supposedly it was going to sort all the grappling at set pieces that players have always got away with, and which there was a lot of talk about at the time.

    Of course what actually happened is they weren't empowered to do anything, basically just stood there for 90 minutes, the grapplers still got away with it and still do to this day, and people have largely stopped caring about it.

    Always seems like football comes up with needlessly complicated solutions that totally miss the point of the problem they were supposed to solve. Sin bins to deal with dissent, when punishments for that already exist but aren't enforced, seems like another example of this.
     
    #31
  12. Ernie Shackleton

    Ernie Shackleton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    13,232
    Likes Received:
    25,070
    This doesn't change my opinion, I'd still bin VAR, but...

    There should be something similar to Umpire's Call in Cricket. (Referee's call, I guess).

    For example, team scores a goal, ref gives it, VAR has a quick check (whilst the celebrations are ongoing). Player was two yards off - VAR overrules. Player timed his run perfectly and was a yard onside when the ball was played - well done ref, as you were, one nil. Can't really tell from this angle, could his nose be offside? Better hold the game up for 5 minutes while we draw lines and run two seconds of videotape back and forth like some static Sisyphean drones, until, in desperation, we guess - no, **** that, just stick with the referee's original decision.
     
    #32
    PLT and Ron Burguvdy like this.
  13. Drew

    Drew Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,366
    Likes Received:
    4,635
    I’d be interested in giving teams check abilities.

    Think somethings up, you can ask to check it. If you’re right, you get your check back. If not you lose it.

    One per half that’s not carried over. Means you can’t abuse it.

    Means not everything is checked.
     
    #33
  14. Evington

    Evington Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Messages:
    7,056
    Likes Received:
    5,164
    Diving bastard
     
    #34
  15. Brucebones

    Brucebones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    8,893
    Likes Received:
    4,173
    The difference, IMO, is Sky shows everything in seconds, “he’s onside, runs through, knocks the ball passed the keeper then dives, clearly see it’s a dive, no penalty.”
    That’s an example that sticks in my mind from a few years ago, it might have been a big game in the PL, for some reason De Gea as the keeper rings a bell.
    But it was shown numerous times on Sky whilst the defending team argued it was a dive.
    Now VAR has one angle, that you can’t see clearly & they’re still deciding if it’s offside or not before they even get to the penalty decision.
     
    #35
    dennisboothstash likes this.

Share This Page