Rangers v Celtic

We actually don’t mention it enough to be honest, maybe we aren’t as bat **** crazy as yous

 

It gets brought up when Celtic go 2-0 up within 3 minutes at the “toughest away ground in the league”

 

Bat **** crazy = Thinking a referee who drinks in Sevco pubs after the New Glasgow Derby may be biased

Completey normal = Thinking a referee who "hears" penalties for you is a fan of your opposition because he goes to Mass

 

Tough for who?

 

1 - 0 against Rossco P.Coltrane at hame.

 

Man enjoys a pint after his work, phone the polis.

This is the sort of bat **** crazy stuff we are talking about, a Rangers shop opening up outside another Scottish teams stadium isn’t even worth thinking about.

 

Mind the absolute meltdown when wee Davie said "Tav does what Tav does"?

Incredible scenes.

 

Yet man goes to Mass and you have him banned from Ibrox for a year

 

Stop talking ****e please.

 

In the last 25 years Celtic and their fans have...

Viciously assaulted a ref on the field of play causing him actual bodily harm.

Smashed the same refs windows and threatened him and his family.

Employed a private detective to follow a ref.

Made life so unbearable for officials they decided to strike.

Forced a ref to quit the game after he made a correct decision against them in the wrong manner. It wasn't a penalty, as we know.

Put a refs family under police protection due to death threats because he was seen in a local pub a full 24 hours after he refereed a match.

Made a film called anyone but Celtic which was shown inside Celtic park.

All which was done while the club was winning 85% of all the domestic trophies available to them. They were even handed one with a third of the season still to play and were allowed to play a final 9 months after it should have been played with players who weren't at the club when it should have been played against a team that they helped relegate when they were given a title because the SPFL lost an email.

Rangers are the establishment club but.

Make it make sense.

 

Sure

Celtic fans went too far because referees were bias against them

Proven bias

Rangers and Sevco fans did not because there is no bias against them

Yet the Ibrox franchise has on a number of occasions complained about referees despite have 72 games without a penalty against them and a similar long stretch without a red card.

Steevee Gs first week he complained about referees and there was no ref strike while Celtic were blamed for a strike after Dougie Dougie gate and the Head of Referees Hugh Dallas being found to be a bigot

On the back of this and such events where referees gave anecdotes of them helping Rangers rip, ABC was filmed and provided more proof of bias.

And despite winning our cases against such bias from referees and the SFA over the years we are the paranoid ones

Lol

 

We only complain when there's something to complain about.

You lot complain whenever there's a reasonable threat to your domination of Scottish football.

 

Example.

What season do the Tims call the Covid season?

Is it the season where they were handed the title via zoom when the season was two thirds played?

No it's the season where all games where played to a finish and Rangers won the title.

#ACND

 

Our domination was threatened in only 1 year and we didn't blame the refs for it.

 

That's the season Gerrard conceded the league early, SPFL copied the stance the French Leage took and THERE WAS A WORLDWIDE PANDEMIC

Didn't Scotland change its league structure and rules to get Sevco into the top flight which also saw Rangers fans threatening to burn down stadiums and boycott teams because...Rangers were eventully treated like all other clubs who went bust?

Yes, the answer is yes.

 

Let's not forget due to Celtic’s domination Sevco fans have thrown wine bottles scarring employees of Celtic, *****file Sevco fans have tried to attack scott brown on the pitch and your Ultras were allowed to bring weapons into Ibrox

I don't need to go back 25 years to find those stories

 

Didn't Celtic break league rules by not having a suitable stadium to play matches in. Didn't they vote against Falkirk entering the Premiership for not having the same kind of suitable stadium to play matches in?

 

Why are they like this?

 

No, Celtic had a suitable stadium but wanted to increase capacity.

I've no idea about Falkirk but it sounds like they didn't have a suitable stadium despite having years to get one.

 

I blame your parents