From a google search the only source I found was the daily mail, a media source with little to no credibility. I just googled her name… you’d have thought considering your claim of wide coverage… well it’s just not there, did see stuff about cats being shot though. So from Women getting sacked for using the word mother, we currently have one single unsubstantiated claim which her former employer refutes and received barely any coverage. Oh dear.
I found at least six reports, I'll put them up tomorrow, since you seem incapable. I saw no reference to her claim being disproven You must have made that up, unless it's in your Mail report which you say has no credibility. And woke organisations are regularly banning the use of "mother". It's there for all to see but those who don't want to find it.
https://www.womensforumaustralia.or...ured_the_australian_breastfeeding_association https://www.2gb.com/breastfeeding-counsellor-sacked-as-mother-deemed-hate-speech/ https://honey.nine.com.au/parenting...ultation/55bd4141-45d2-40b7-88bc-c1334fac9a22 https://www.6pr.com.au/breastfeeding-counsellor-sacked-after-mother-deemed-hate-speech/ https://familyvoice.org.au/campaigns/do-not-cave-to-woke-trans-ideology There's none so blind as they who will not see...
Is that 6 different women sacked? or 6 reports of the same one where the company refute the allegation? If it’s just the one refuted claim that’s needed hmmmm wonder what a quick search on Boris Johnson might turn up, yeah let’s not go there. You’re so desperate for these sackings to be true despite the absolute lack of any real evidence, it’s a bit sad really.
So one unsubstantiated claim from various rags/online bastions of truth. I’m going to hazard a guess she didn’t win anything for incorrect dismissal.
NHS staff demand word 'woman' is reinstated on webpages over 'disrespectful' change Using the words "people with a vagina" is "dehumanising", argue NHS staff. By LUKE WHELAN 08:43, Tue, Mar 7, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:37, Tue, Mar 7, 2023 Rather than using the word "woman", the NHS uses phrases like "anyone with a cervix", according to the staff. by Taboola The letter, seen by Express.co.uk, said: "We call for the reinstatement of sex-based, respectful communication that meets the healthcare needs of women. "Specifically, the NHS must use women’s words for women’s bodies and women’s health problems. "NHS.UK healthcare messaging shows a lack of concern for women, is disrespectful and insults women." please log in to view this image Over 19 NHS webpages have removed reference of the word 'woman', including pregnancy pages. (Image: Getty) The staff argue the censorship of the word woman is "considered misogynistic" and "undermines trust in the NHS". The letter, which was signed by 1,200 clinicians, added: "Language such as 'people with a vagina' is dehumanising and reduces women and girls to body parts, such as genitalia." The letter's signatories include ex-NHS bosses, such as Maura Buchanan, former president of the Royal College of Nursing. One signatory wrote: "I'm signing as a relatively young woman, who was diagnosed with reproductive cancer. I found it insulting and alienating to find myself being referred to by my body parts, and bodily functions and as 'a person undergoing a specific (invasive, deeply unpleasant and painful) medical procedure/s'. This undermined my faith and trust in the NHS, at a time when patient trust is of utmost importance." Staff are also complaining the changes were made without consulting the relevant people. The letter claimed the changes were done without public consultation, and without consideration of how women feel. The Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender said the changes "occurred by stealth" over the past few years in all four nations of the UK. NHS Guidance on miscarriages has replaced the words "most women" with "most people", for example. It used to read "for most women, a miscarriage is a one-off event and they go on to have a successful pregnancy in future".
One instance then, that was widely reported in Australia but not here it seems, and which was refuted by her employer. Why would anyone not in your particular rabbit-hole be aware of this, or concerned by it?
The importance is that this is a recent case and shows which way the Woke momentum is swinging...hopefully sense will prevail ultimately
