Jack Diamond

So if she wanted his money that's okay? FFS man

 

Of course not , but i don’t know if her motive was genuine or bad. A load of blokes slagging off women isn’t right though.

 

So, despite there being a full court case with a jury, days of evidence from both sides and a not guilty verdict ...

... you're saying he may be guilty.

Seriously wtf.

The only women I'm slagging off are those who wrongly accuse men of a serious crime, I'm happy with that.

 

I sat on two rape trials when I did jury duty last year, neither should have got to court and both we unanimous not guilty verdicts.

There's no excuse for rape, but there's no excuse for false accusations of rape either. It's a career and sometimes life ending accusation.

 

I’m saying that her intentions may not have been based on malice, I trust the judgement and feel for him going through a tough process. I just personally don’t think a bunch of lads on a board making judgments over a complex offence is a good look but I’ll say no more

 

Bit sexist to assume everyone contributing to this thread identifies as male TBH.

 

He was found not guilty, it's the jury making judgements ... we're commenting on the judgement.

And if we're all supposed to be so considerate perhaps you should consider changing your highly offensive username.

 

I for one am a Thermos flask.

 

Do you know where it’s from my username? Sure it was one of your final threads on ready to moan

 

Wasn’t it that drunk feller who needed up arguing with his own posts

 

Exactly. One of the best series of drunken posts I’ve ever seen

 

It was hilarious, Reiver turned into pure river slut with his drunken typing

 

Sometimes you get some gems of posts early in the morning before they are deleted

 

Them were the days, pages of deletions and blanket bans, rtg at it's best

 

I think the best thing that can happen is this thread gets locked.

There are 2 people that know what happened. One of them accused the other of wrongdoing, but it wasn't proven in court. End of story

 

Not to mention accusations of being "rattled" and offers to meet up for fights in pub car parks

 

It was proven that he wasn't guilty, that's what matters.

'The jury of nine women and three men took less than an hour to deliver not guilty verdicts on both counts.'

 

That's what I said. He wasn't found guilty. He doesn't need to prove his innocence, the accuser/prosecution have to prove his guilt. When guilt cannot be proven (beyond reasonable doubt) then a not guilty verdict is returned.

It's semantics, but he wasn't proven not to be guilty, they couldn't prove he was guilty.

 

Jury took 7 minutes to deliver they're verdict according to Look Newcastle this morning..
Says it all really.