if they are 20 in the one group and 15 are being ****s im sorry but all 20 are being ****ed out by the big polak bouncer, or is that only the rule for white natives ?
I could understand it if they were in one group But what this guy has done would be like no Premiership team signing an argentinian because Tevez has been a ****
That makes the analogy better IMO Hash had it Just been Tevez you could be forgiven for trying again, no?
Those Argies still haven't forgiven us the ass-whoopin' they got back in '82. I'm not racist btw. I just think the word "jiggaboo" is funny and wanted to use it
I’m not sure that there’s anything particularly wrong with him highlighting a very specific group of people that he’s had trouble with in the past, Hash. By saying that he won’t represent this very specific group of people in the future, however, he appears to disallow the possibility (and actuality) that “black Africans” may not all be one and the same. Such a mindset in the average civilian may be considered unfortunate; coming from a public figure and elected representative of all constituents, however, it’s not only unfortunate, but needlessly provocative, horribly ill-considered, anti-democratic and racist. That’s the problem. I’m not sure if this is a serious point or not? But our elected representatives are there for us all, Hashling, not just for those people who voted for them. And why should he represent them? Because it’s the right thing to do and because Ireland should strive to be a better country than one which allows her public representatives to exclude sections of society from the democratic process. How is this not obvious?