1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Comparitive stas Lucas V adam

Discussion in 'Liverpool' started by moreinjuredthanowen, Nov 22, 2011.

  1. moreinjuredthanowen

    moreinjuredthanowen Mr Brightside

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    122,798
    Likes Received:
    29,627
    to continue the deabte form yestderays match review i have dug into the LFC website and can offer the following stas for a continued deabte on Adam.

    I felt his midfield partner was a reasonable comparison point given their stats are right there for us to look at and we are playing 4-4-2 a lot

    1. General
    Pl mins st SO Soff DW ADW I
    Lucas Leiva 11 955 11 - 2 61.4% 47.2% 27
    Charlie Adam 12 995 12 - 1 55.6% 73.9% 19

    pl = played
    mins = mins played
    St = starts
    SO = sub on
    SOff = subbed off
    DW = duels won
    ADW = aerial duels won
    I = interceptions

    2. Defense
    Tk TKwon Cl B
    Lucas Leiva 61 73.8% 12 4
    Charlie Adam 27 77.8% 15 5

    Tk=tackles made
    Tkwon = takles won
    CL = clearances
    B = blocks

    3. distribution
    P LP PA PPG TC SC SA
    Lucas Leiva 612 8.3% 84.8% 55.6 1 - 10
    Charlie Adam 574 12.7% 77% 47.8 26 19.2% 25

    P= total passes
    LP = long pass
    PA = passing accuracy
    PPG = passes per game
    TC= total crosses
    SC = successful crosses
    SA = shot assists

    4. Attack
    G MPG s soT GIB GOB CR
    Lucas Leiva - 0 4 - - - 0%
    Charlie Adam 2 497.5 14 5 1 1 14.3%

    g=goals
    mpg =mins per goal
    S = shots
    SOt is shots on target
    GIB = goals in box
    GOB = goals outside box
    CR = conversion rate

    5. discipline
    FW FC Y R
    Lucas Leiva 8 18 5 -
    Charlie Adam 18 25 2 1

    Fw = fouls won
    FC= fouls conceeded
    Y = yellow
    R = red

    .................................................................

    So what does all of this mean?

    My view

    Before I start I'll say again I've an absolute right to state an opinion especially if i'm the one bothering to try to make the debate, come on giving abuse and you WILL get it back in spades. come on debating and you'll get an open conversation.

    So. I think the stats are interesting from a couple of points of view.

    First Lucas is clearly making more passes and mostly short passes by linking the play between defense and midfield.

    Lucas seems to be making the majority of tackles as well and combining that with his fouls conceeded being less that adam's ther eis something i nthere that suggests lucas is quite busy defensively, which makes sense of course. Its also interesting to see Lucas with less fouls has 5 yellows. That may suggest he's ending up making worse fouls covering others positions by stretching to get there but also he may just be i nthe ref's ear too much as well.

    Adam on the other hand seems to be getting quite a few corsses in, free kick taking duties? Adam is also more fouled and commits more fouls so one part of that suggests he's on the ball more while lucas is moving the ball faster and shorter.

    Adam seems to be the one going for the aerial battle in midfield also.

    So over all the stats marry to the view that lucas is the defensive main stay and adam is playing a more attacking role and getting on the ball more.

    If we combine two stas on Adam, number of tackles made v no of fouls committed I think we get to a point where we see why he is critised. so far the point levelled at him is work rate and seeing he's not getting those tackles in successfully or should i say making that many at all you i think can see why he is critised.

    It is interesting to note he is there making the same blocks and clearances as lucas

    On the counter point he is making an attacking contribution and inevitably his lower pass success rate comes from that, through balls, longer passes etc.

    Do mistakes count that much? Is adam being singled out for the spurs game and perhaps not having the impact form set pieces expected? Or is there an element of the judgment being made before he was signed?

    My own view is that we had better players like meireles and those who've gone before and Adam has to be counted as a useful squad addition but not the guy who'll hold the position if we are to progress further (europe, tophies etc) I think we'll buy again in midfield.

    why? becasue the stats do show that his game needs a lot of work from a positional point of view, not to ruin the edge of his attakcing game but to resolve the defensive issues.
     
    #1
  2. Jimmy Squarefoot

    Jimmy Squarefoot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    29,130
    Likes Received:
    7,824
    I think Adam is doing what we expected which is to provide a little more composure in the midfield and for his passing range. Whilst I accept he's not Alonso, we did decent business for £8m considering we don't have Champions League football to lure better players.

    I was expecting Lucas to make more tackles without a doubt however I was expecting Adam to have more of the ball and make more passes. I will blame that due to learning a newe system, working with new players however I do see him growing more. On the other hand, it shows us how lucky we are that we have a DM in Lucas who has the ability to win the ball and can pass accurately.

    Whilst the partnership is nowhere near as good Alonso and Mascherano, it is starting to develop and becoming more effective. It's no coincidence that we are dominating games and creating more chances this season.
     
    #2
  3. moreinjuredthanowen

    moreinjuredthanowen Mr Brightside

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    122,798
    Likes Received:
    29,627
    Well it will be interesting to see how gerrard gets accomodated in the end as well.
     
    #3
  4. Red Hadron Collider

    Red Hadron Collider The Hammerhead

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    57,478
    Likes Received:
    9,839
    Not heard anything about Gerrard for some time. He keeps getting these infections. It seems as though something's wrong with his immune system <yikes>
     
    #4
  5. The artist JerryChristmas

    The artist JerryChristmas "Massive old member"

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Messages:
    14,503
    Likes Received:
    1,686
    Duels won? I like the idea of stats for duelling....I challenge you to a duel <laugh> Think you'd be in trouble if a stat like that ever dropped below 100% though eh.

    Seriously though I never ever judge a player on Opta stats alone (or any other tbh) I prefer to judge them with my eyes. Simply put Adam has done ok so far, his mobility and positional sense need work but his distribution and ball carrying are excellent at times. Sunday aside his set pieces are good as well and he's certainly not afraid to have a pop at goal. As with any player it's impossible to say what's around the corner but all in all a good start to his career at Anfield.
     
    #5
  6. Foredeckdave

    Foredeckdave Music Thread Manager

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    19,804
    Likes Received:
    132
    "My view

    Before I start I'll say again I've an absolute right to state an opinion especially if i'm the one bothering to try to make the debate, come on giving abuse and you WILL get it back in spades. come on debating and you'll get an open conversation."

    As I will assume that this comment is directly pointed at me I will respond appropriately. WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

    You are not the arbiter of what is and is not abusive and I will neither be censored or threatened by your your opinion.

    The staistics that you present are both simplistic and misleading. Lucas and Adam are playing as a midfield pair. Whilst their roles are to a degree complimentary they are also different. Perhaps the only time that such a direct comparison could truly be useful is when you have 2 players erforming the same role independantly eg Quarterbacks playing with the same squad.

    The Universe used to create the percentages given is so small that the voloitility within the data is far too high to statisically have any true confidence. Therefore to base your analysis purely on this data means that your analyisis has to be lacking.

    Now you can take that as abuse if you so wish. I state again, I really don't care.
     
    #6

Share This Page