The total failure of devolution in Wales, owned exclusively by Labour, its creators please log in to view this image
She’s also completely mental. Her brownness is not what got her sacked, her mentalness is. You have to be seriously ****ing unhinged to stand out as mental in this Tory government btw.
Nice that she’s afforded the luxury of giving her side of the story on social media and on tv first though.
Did they help their case? I very much doubt it. Desperation there claiming they were asked for money to make it all go away.
That only makes it worse, he could probably pinch his nostrels & vote for a tiny Indian man but a woman? Name me one actual Socialis/communist/Labour woman leader in history ? His Tory?
How much more of this can you totally make up? You seem hell bent on narrowing the argument to ignore the facts that are inconvenient to you. You have dropped the Newark MP, the lawyers and the ECHR. Q: Who said anything about ‘all’ illegal immigrants being in four star hotels? A: You. Q: Who said anything about asylum seeker benefits being better in France? A: You. Q: Who said they ‘all’ work for Deliveroo? A: You. In the France, asylum seekers cannot work for the first six months of their stay whilst in the UK they cannot apply for permission to work for twelve months. So those riding bikes for fast food delivery services are probably working illegally. If their asylum claims have been accepted then they are obviously not working illegally as they have permission to stay. Asylum seekers in France are entitled to housing but are not guaranteed it as there is less housing available than claimants; and just like here they have to go where the immigration authority sends them. If they fail to show up for any appointment set by the immigration authority in France their claim of asylum will be rejected and their benefits removed. Many asylum seekers in France live in refugee camps. In 2022, France had 45,000 more asylum applications than the UK but the acceptance rate was only 25 per cent whilst in the UK it was 76 per cent.
Sounds a bit like a government strategy of getting xenophobic morons riled up to distract from far bigger issues.
An interview with a CCHQ-appointed fluffer doesn't really spell trouble, especially after 20 months of the BBC and its Tufton St alumni management refusing to report on this matter except for one five-minute section on Newsnight when Kirsty Wark just screeched over her guests "It was an emergency! An emergency, I tell you!", before they could answer her loaded questions. They're pretending it was because of SLAPP orders from her lawyers - but the Good Law Project just told her lawyers to **** off and kept reporting on it (as did the Guardian and the Mirror), and have been completely vindicated. Let's hope, if she's interviewed again by the BBC (doubt it) then it'll be by Derbyshire, or by Rigby on Sky, or, best of all, by Maitliss now freed of the Tufton St-operated tentacles of the BBC. But the question to ask is this - Gove was on last week saying that he couldn't comment as it's sub-judice, yet here she is now getting her retaliation in first. Why? Just go back to Kuenssberg's CCHQ-approved interview with Matthew Elliott of Vote Leave BEFORE the Electoral Commission roundly condemned them. It was a PR stunt to ensure that there was no way they could face public prosecution by claiming they now couldn't get a fair trial - because of the press exposure. Square that circular logic. And that is what they're trying now, with the same client journalist. https://x.com/JolyonMaugham/status/1111904501294874624?s=20 But in essence, here is their defence - she didn't benefit because the profits went into a trust fund, and she continuously lied about her involvement and had her lawyers impose a blanket SLAPP order on the media (that proper journalists ignored) because... it's not a crime to lie to the press. How much more atypical is this morass of sleaze, lies, cronyism, and corruption in the story of the dying days of this Tory Kleptopia? Indeed, Toryism per se across the ages? Bent, irredeemably bent, corrupt, and venal. Meet the new OCG boss - same as the old boss.
Completely - Kuenssberg pre-emptive, CCHQ-approved PR interception, Matthew Elliott 2.0 (see Good Law Project link https://x.com/JolyonMaugham/status/1111904501294874624?s=20 ).
