We can work with the new government of libya.............

What a **** that Cameron is.A 69 year old man was butt raped with a knife and he recokons it's good for the country?**** off you ****er.

 

he doesn't care at all, he is in the job for the title and the money. Afterwards, he can use this ONE term as PM to earm millions just like Blair by touring, 'motivation' speeches and memoirs.

 

Do you suggest we should have left Ghadaffi alone and let him slaughter the rebels?

 

Do you believe that the wests intervention in Lybia was done for some sort of humanitarian reason? Do you have any idea what these rebels are about?

 

yes ... as by saying yes to your question ''leave him alone?'' there would be no rebels to slaughter

 

I don't really have much of an idea what the Rebels are about but I believe NATO intervention was called for if only to oust Ghaddaffi.

 

Ireland's contribution to the war in Libya was exemplary

 

what war ? it was a one sided witch hunt

 

Maybe I'm biased Dev but when I see Britain on a vacation overseas I smell skulldugary.

 

What quarral has Ireland got with Lybia? I had a soft spot for the colonel anyway. The man was murdered.

 

**** him ... and they were mock rebels , britain : irish rebels are bad evil terrorists , lets back the rebels in a far flung country that has oil

 

i had a tattoo of him booked before all the ''rebellion'' kicked off , im having second thoughts now though <dontwantaggroonholidayswiththewifeandkids>

 

Syria needs saving from having too much lovely oil, cough, i mean an oppressive regime too.....................

 

They should just come out and say 'look lads, our society needs shed loads of oil to operate, we are gonna head over and steal Lybias'.

 

i object to your unfounded statement ... blame the doofus boat

 

The simple truth is the leaders of all countries are ****s who will jump into bed with anyone if they think they can gain from it.
They don't represent their people.
Especially not our ****ing leaders.

 

Well you have to ask yourself what is the better option on balance, Ghadaffi being allowed to commit war crimes and retain his despotic regime or some of our Jets lending the rebels assistance. The UN want to send peacekeeping troops to Libya, would the UK be in the wrong if they complied with the UN's wishes?

Should we let other African armies - who, are shall we say "untrustworthy", keep the peace in Libya?

I don't really care if the UK government do have ulterior motives, in this situation I beleive 100% that not only was intervention the correct thing to do, it was the humanitarian thing to do.