what we were talking about please log in to view this image what Dev is talking about please log in to view this image
You have consistently criticised the military and the Police for use of excessive force (amongst other things) yet you would have no such qualms about taking the life of an unarmed man because he insulted you. You also say you would use a weapon if necesarry - even if he was unarmed. Surely if I was on duty as either a policeman or a soldier (let's say on peacekeeping duties in some foreign country) then I would have the right to shoot someone who insulted me or my wife?
are you really this dense? can you really not read? or differentiate between this thread and the military debates? and to clarify, i have no qualms if a man dies by my hands IF he instigates If you read the weapons bit, it was in relation to someone breaking in. And although you added the 'even if he was unarmed' bit (is that military or police training? to make stuff up), I will confess that if a person broke into my house I wouldnt wait to see if he was armed/unarmed Your question is in relation to you and you already said you would run away etc, so why ask? Me I wouldnt be illegaly ocuppying lands and killing innocents to protect some one else, so the situation wouldnt arise as a civilian if someone insults me then I feel I have a right to respond
You are now ignoring the points I have made which says everything about you. According to you the military is ALWAYS the aggressor, what a shambles of a man you are.
