Pretty much spot on mate although you forgot about Smiths ineffective tactics that clearly not working and were never working!
So what you are saying Nev is that: 1st goal - McGregor didn't save it. 2nd goal - Hooper, after running 60 yards, stretched to get on the end of Izzy's cross and managed to guide it past McGregor, who was only prepared for one kind of shot. What about the third goal, big chap? Flap, flap, flap!!
Aye and maybe thats why everytime Jelavic got the ball it went about 15 yards wide eh? The only reason you lost was because the weird shaped ball was possessed. Meaning when a celtic player struck it - it went in their favour and when a Rangers player struck it, it went astray. I think you shoulp phone the embassy about Mitre and ask why they make anti rangers balls
I'm waiting on an email from the RU about any of there balls being reported missing. If so I'm confident I can trace is back to CP
edge, I don't think any of the players were happy with the ball. Celtic had a free-kick and Commons was pointing out that the ball looked ****ed, but Brines made him play on with it. Gotta say though, the 'egg-shaped ball' excuse surely surpasses anything our lot have come up with for ages
Yep - bring back the Mitre Mouldmaster. get clattered with that and you've got dimples on your leg for a week Or is this me just showing my age?
why dont the just make balls they way they used to before we saw all these daft swerving shots. bring back the adidas questra please log in to view this image
Seriously though. If the ball was egged which I believe it was by everyone's reactio. Why did Brines insist on continuing to use it? Both teams had to play with it and had no bearing on the game but baffling none the less. Did Brines steal all the other ones to sell on eBay and didn't wanted outed?
Brines threw it to McGregor, as soon as it landed in McGregor's hands he frowned and looked at it as if it was a black baby
