No you didn't answer it, you just admitted yourself nobody has actually said it and it's based on what you think, so you've twisted what people have actually posted to suit what you think / your agenda. Thanks for confirming it though
We could have had a better start We could be on 30 points We could have had a worse start We could be on 3 points as beating sheff masisve is easy
Eh? So you think our start is good and are happy with how we've started? Great stuff, end of story then! I'll strike from the record all your posts complaining that we should have more points because of how we've performed in games then. You accuse me of wanting to start arguments, but you responded to a post tweeting a podcast praising our start with a defensive 'Who's said we've had a bad start?' post.
Right. Enough. Fity %0 ***^&%^* *^%$^%&%$ *%^%^&**(****** pages. Of what??? I have a suggestion. Why not lock down each individual match thread 24 hours after the game finishes? We are three and a half hours away from kick off at Millwall, and you are all still banging on about Ipswich. Come on Admin sort this playground na na na once and for all.
Right so you've just proved what I said again then haha..... I along with other have said it's been a good start but could have been better, which it has and I'll remind you of what I posted yesterday just to be sure... Has it been a good start... absolutely, could it have been better... absolutely. Stop trying to twist things Syd. You're just making yourself look a tool
I'm not picking an argument over anything, just pointing out the absolute ****e you've just posted and I will correct people when they try to tell me I've said something I haven't. Just stop making stuff up and twisting things. It's really not hard is it
We've had a good start, it could, and perhaps should, have been better. The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
You asked who said we hadn't had a good start, I said the people who thought we should have done better, and you've carried on on the back of that. And you're still going. The tweet wasn't posted in response to you, my post wasn't necessarily aimed at you, but you've taken both as being directed at you and carried on about both. You asked the question to the thread and I regret daring to give an answer as it's clearly upset you immensely.
You're just twisting my words now. Don't worry though, admin will sort it out. The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
This is discussion???? It is a game of pedantry and point scoring. Or, if as you see it, what have I gleaned from this learned discourse? Nothing really. You have all wasted your time.
So again...nobody has actually said it's been a bad start, it's just you taking what they've said and deciding on their behalf that they are saying it's a bad start ... Correct? And all I did was point out that you making **** up in your head isn't what people have said especially me when I've posted numerous times saying that opposite. And surely you've not that full of yourself that you actually think you've upset me immensely..... Or then again it is you so who knows. Just have a day of fron being the complete tit you seen to thrive on being and maybe every single interaction you have with people on here won't turn into this.....whether you like it or not or are big enough to admit it, you're the common denominator
Don't read the thread then... It's really not hard is it or is the back button out of reach from up on your high horse
So no one's said it, and the original post was just that - a post - and you got worked up over it. Time to move on ffs.
Some say Syd should be a politician, and some of them say it should be Harold Holt, I couldn't possibly comment. The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
If you think that's lashing out then you really need to go experience the real world..... Anyway I thought it was time to move? Or is that only after you've mad one last comment after saying move on
