The point has been made and as I explained already you have missed it. Whether that is down to ignorance or stupidity on your part I don't really care.
Need I remind you that you are the only one who has resorted to swearing on this thread. And you talk about me bearing grudges and getting wound up?
again with the unrelated questions Yes I have heard of courageous restraint, and? my initial 'whats he on about?' was linked to your comment So why should the military just not adopt that attitude? I really dont see the link/relevance to what the conversation was about hence the asking for clarification
In relation to what the conversation was, to me it appears irrelevant tbh and doesnt make sense Just seems to be 'payback' based on previous conversations which were totally different IMO But yes, please explain your point for clarification purposes if you wouldnt mind
PS This bit was irrelevant and not true to the conversation too IMO On a seperate note, I do find it amusing that someone who is noted for his criticism of the actions of the military in general (in particular their over reliance of brute force) is espousing the use of excessive force in a situation where it could be avoided
You have been highly critical of the Police and the Military are their tactics/methods, you have been overbearingly vocal in your condemnation, yet you would willingly kill someone for insulting your family or attack a man who is already on the ground (and use a weapon if required) and not really care too much if he died. Don't you think you are being hypocritical or contradictary when you criticise the actions of others whilst condoning acts you would willingly carry out?
