It's a bit early even for that drunken layabout...so he's just a nob then. Seems to be a bit of trait for lefty remoaners to think making an arse of yourself as long as it interrupts things even briefly is the same as making a point.
I see the usual suspects still haven't found a backbone. They've **** all to say, but spend all day not saying it.
Steve has made millions grifting from Brexit & claims "We are all worse off " Femi will be out rattling his little cup too .
He's very shy about submitting his accounts, but he's stating on his fundraiser that the pot had a rolling £50k petty cash box a few years ago, and he'll have learned a few tricks since then.
It's notable how the response to tragedies from the left is as predictable elsewhere as it is on here. Yet they seem to think they're being smart.
Expanding it to what? What area does it cover now and how large will the expansion be. The last frame is the important one.
You can only research if you have funding, and people will only fund research that is liable to provide the answer they want, and they can be very selective with the terms of the research question. There are exceptions, such as that for ULEZ, where the researchers were pressured to come up with 'alternative' versions of the facts. It's compounded because the information is then passed through non-expert bodies, who butcher the findings to suit the agenda that protects their jobs and gets them more funding from politicians who are also driven to follow the agenda that they feel gets them the most votes and/or extra cash or influence.
Biggest con ever was "carbon credits", the idea was ok until you looked at it. One company was allowed 10 carbon credits but only used 6. Great you may think but no, the company down the road used all their credits but still had work to do so they just bought the spare 4 credits from the first company. What does this mean? well bassically the amount of carbon produced meant **** all because we didn't want to save the Earth from those 4 credits and allowed someone to go over their limit for money. Saving the Earth my arse.
Carbon off setting is an even bigger scam, with many of the projects failing such as the majority of trees being the wrong type, the majority not surviving or being planted on land that had a bigger carbon capture rate than the trees they replaced them with, or the projects never even starting in the first place. Companies got cheaper bills for signing up for green energy. Many times there is more energy subscribed to the scheme than the grid can produce from green sources. For the calculations, it is the value for those subscribed that is presented as the reduction, even though it's impossible for it to be correct. A while back, the concern was global dimming and/or global cooling due to particulate in the atmosphere. There was and still is a concerted effort to reduce particulate emissions. Already that should give a hint on a potential unintended outcome, but it can be seen relatively clearly when looking at India, where the clean up of particulate lagged other places, and unsurprisingly, so did the temperature rise.
