1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The Premier League Thread

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by TheSecondStain, Jun 28, 2016.

  1. thereisonlyoneno7

    thereisonlyoneno7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    21,040
    Likes Received:
    32,257
    Exactly what i did :)
     
    #35261
  2. Schrodinger's Cat

    Schrodinger's Cat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    5,651
    Likes Received:
    8,798
    96th minute own goal to lose the game made me smile. I was conflicted that it was Spurs getting the points, but it happened to Liverpool so that's good
     
    #35262
  3. The Ides of March

    The Ides of March Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2011
    Messages:
    13,390
    Likes Received:
    5,066
    I am happy that you are happy!! Hope you feel just as happy should they stuff Chelsea!!
     
    #35263
  4. Osvaldorama

    Osvaldorama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    14,799
    Likes Received:
    14,157
    99BAEF89-F50C-48DD-A659-75628089EC5D.jpeg

    Wow. VAR officials completely messed up
     
    #35264
  5. jaySFC

    jaySFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,031
    Likes Received:
    1,407
    FFS, they need to get rid of VAR. These corrupt officials cannot be trusted to use it properly.
     
    #35265
    Osvaldorama likes this.
  6. ......loading......

    ......loading...... 25 undefeated

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    12,908
    Likes Received:
    13,440
    I said it looked onside! Even the TV people never said anything!
     
    #35266
    SAINTOSPREY, jaySFC and Osvaldorama like this.
  7. ChilcoSaint

    ChilcoSaint What a disgrace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    39,423
    Likes Received:
    39,386
    So if VAR can’t actually be trusted to correct clear and obvious errors by the on-field officials, what on earth is the point of it?
     
    #35267
  8. San Tejón

    San Tejón Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2014
    Messages:
    16,341
    Likes Received:
    21,493
    I was waiting for the lines to appear and show that the goal was good and couldn’t understand why it didn’t happen.
     
    #35268
    jaySFC and ......loading...... like this.
  9. ......loading......

    ......loading...... 25 undefeated

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    12,908
    Likes Received:
    13,440
    Glad I didn’t take my tv for repairs
     
    #35269
  10. Osvaldorama

    Osvaldorama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    14,799
    Likes Received:
    14,157
    In all fairness. It’s quite funny to see Liverpool get shafted.
    So whilst it’s infuriating, im also loving it
     
    #35270

  11. ......loading......

    ......loading...... 25 undefeated

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    12,908
    Likes Received:
    13,440
    It is just time to get rid of it. We lost a league final because of bad decisions and yet not one of us - that I know of - wants to keep it. Bin VAR.
     
    #35271
    ChilcoSaint likes this.
  12. ChilcoSaint

    ChilcoSaint What a disgrace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    39,423
    Likes Received:
    39,386
    As I have always said, the real problem is with the standard of the officials. Most of the professional ones just aren’t up to the job, either on field or in the VAR suite. Having one set of clowns trying to watch over another set of clowns is never going to work.
     
    #35272
    Osvaldorama likes this.
  13. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    68,452
    Likes Received:
    37,444
    It clearly looked onside at the time. The fact the check was so quick did set my alarm bells ringing. That sort of error is completely unacceptable. Liverpool should, and will I think, kick up an enormous stink over this. They will demand action. It's embarrassing how two professional referees couldn't see that looked onside from the replay and asked for lines to be drawn. The penalty Wolves didn't get, while it was a really bad call VAR didn't recommend an on field review, this is a million times worse. Liverpool were denied a perfectly good goal by not one, but two officials who didn't do their job. If Howard Webb wants to maintain any sort of credibility, he should suspend Darren England and Dan Cook, pending a thorough investigation. Then fire them.
     
    #35273
    ChilcoSaint likes this.
  14. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    68,452
    Likes Received:
    37,444
    They are not corrupt. Please don't say without any proof. Incompetent, yes, but no evidence of being corrupt.
     
    #35274
    milton archer and Saints14 like this.
  15. Le Tissier's Laces

    Le Tissier's Laces Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    43,165
    Likes Received:
    49,162
    There isn’t any point in it, nobody wants it. Consign it to the bin. Look how much more enjoyable it is this season without it. And this is meant to be entertainment, ultimately.
     
    #35275
  16. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    68,452
    Likes Received:
    37,444
    So apparently, Darren England drew the lines correctly and saw it was onside. What he then did was mistakenly say "check complete" instead of "award the goal". Everyone says the wrong thing occasionally so that's forgivable. What isn't forgivable is for either him or the assistant VAR Dan Cook to not realise his error and tell the ref to hold on before the game restarted. It will be very interesting to hear the audio of this when Webb next appears on Sky Sports on that show with Michael Owen.
     
    #35276
  17. Saintmagic

    Saintmagic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    22,950
    Likes Received:
    16,991
    Wonder what Peter Walton had to say about it in the studio.
     
    #35277
  18. Paddy Podped

    Paddy Podped Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    6,012
    Likes Received:
    5,514
  19. Che’s Godlike Thighs

    Che’s Godlike Thighs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    14,440
    Likes Received:
    23,986
    I remember in the 90s this was a common conception. Always used to hear it on MotD and so on. And if you think about it, there is some sense to be made from it.
    A team with one less player is usually bound to go ultra-defensive, particularly if they are winning. So while the team with eleven will gain the ball far more, they're going to find it a lot harder to create space and opportunities in the final third.

    But, I'd guess it probably only applies to a short time period, like 20-30 minutes, rather than an entire game, because those ten men will tire faster.
     
    #35279
    thereisonlyoneno7 likes this.
  20. thereisonlyoneno7

    thereisonlyoneno7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    21,040
    Likes Received:
    32,257
    And if you go ultra defensive, it means you're not attacking so the one man down wont matter as much - in fact you will have more behind the ball than you did before probably.

    EDIT: Out of principle though I will not agree with NJ as he is a twat.
     
    #35280

Share This Page