https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...tionally-illiterate-english-accepted-met-bid/ Met Police recruit 'functionally illiterate in English' in attempt to improve diversity HM Inspectorate says while it is ‘noble and right’ recruitment should not be at the expense of standards Oh dear
The Proud boys are banned as a terrorist group , but they give Standing ovations to SS officers in Trudeau's Canadian parliament when Zelenskyy is in town rattling his cup . Weird that the ADL haven't commented on this
You mean you've googled, and found something you think digs you out of the hole you're digging yourself deeper and deeper into. You've failed again by the way. You're a ****ing ******, and you became fixated by me due to getting your arse handed back to you each time over ten years that you try to have a little dig, but you just end up demonstrating how much of a ****** you are more and more with every post. Try to lose the DMD obsession you clearly have, and engage with the topic not the poster.
you do love a little rant don’t you. Prove what I said is incorrect Einstein. You are getting closer to the 10 years you constantly mention, but not quite close enough. I guess in your fantasy world truth doesn’t matter. Keep it up champ, it makes you look more and more desperate every day.
It was 1671, so he is over 100 years out anyway. And it was Iron and acid mixed together that gave off hydrogen. 1776 Henry Cavendish found that when hydrogen was burnt it gave off water.
To reach a verdict all 12 must agree, if not a judge may accept an 11-1 or 10-2. One day you be be on jury serive and you will understand how it works, until then go find out what a woman is.
You've yet to address any of the points you piped in to show your ignorance on you ****ing muppet, so you're in no place to make demands that I embarrass you further. Found these petrol buses yet you ****ing dipstick?
He's got the whole internet to use as a resource, and he's piped up with the first thing he found to try to detract from his ridiculous claim that it's 'in its infancy'. It's quite old technology on the whole, and in the context of the conversation he jumped in on very little is liable to be produced by electrolysis.
You were far too gutless to call your mate out for his obvious **** up. Instead, you went on to make bigger ones of your own. "Accepting that this technology is in its infancy" What ****ing ****** you are pie no guts.
I answered part of one of your posts yesterday, which I even highlighted so the dimwitted prick that you are, would know what I was answering. You not understanding that says more about you than it does me I will also quite happily stand by my comment that hydrogen as a viable energy source is in its infancy. Prove that it’s not. Please provide the links to the academic publications you have made to the relevant scientific publications which shows you are a leading expert on hydrogen. If not, shut the **** up you noddy as you are no more an expert than I am
You've tried to spin yourself out of your **** up so much you don't even know what the question you're supposedly answering is, nor do you know what my position on the topic is, you thick twat. Pumpey must be cringing at you flagging up their ignorance again and again, and adding your own bits of stupidity to it. To refresh your empty head, the statement your fellow ****wit made was 'hydro is the future' I simply asked them what they based that on, bearing in mind they thought buses ran on petrol. All of your badly googled bollocks has very little bearing on that.
To be fair, given you've shown yourself to be a cowardly, dishonest, racist hypocrite among other failings, being a thick **** is probably a plus for your reputation.
