I am at the opposite end of the spectrum, in that I have always considered Brand to be a complete knob.
However, having just watched the programme, there doesn't seem to be any real evidence of anything illegal. Allegations, but no evidence.
What seems to be in no doubt is that Brand in those days when he was at the height of his fame was a sexual predator who would shag anything that moved.
Woman after woman offered themselves to him openly and these women were clearly vacuous groupies looking to get laid by a famous bloke or hoping to get on in TV.
He was clearly a misogynistic, sexual predator who got off on the control he exerted over these stupid women . I'm always wary of more and more allegations coming to light, many years after the alleged events.
I do suspect that his political views are a possible reason for this exposè, with the BBC and CH4 wanting him discredited, along with, arguably, the establishment who don't like his views.
Either way, it does seem that these broadcasters ignored many, many opportunities to bring him to account over his treatment of women. They have previous in this regard.
Listening to the stuff he came out with back then is unthinkable in this day and age. Even on mainstream radio he was talking about a newsreader on his programme in a completely inappropriate, sexual manner.
It does appear to have been an open secret among many women that they shouldn't allow themselves to be alone with him.
There may be more to come out, but it feels like a possible witch hunt against a very, very odious, misogynistic man.