- May 22, 2011
- 73,759
- 25,695
- 113
No idea how reliable…
You must log in or register to see media
Seems was very reliable
No idea how reliable…
You must log in or register to see media
This.Just a minute folks. Bellingham was the golden boy, the perfect fit and he supposedly wanted to come to Liverpool. But it was decided that he was too expensive and we lost him. Now we are talking £111 million for another player, a good player but perhaps not as good as Bellingham. Meanwhile, we could not afford to get the Lavia deal over the line.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Caicedo is a very good player and it would be a great signing but I am having trouble joining the dots here
Just a minute folks. Bellingham was the golden boy, the perfect fit and he supposedly wanted to come to Liverpool. But it was decided that he was too expensive and we lost him. Now we are talking £111 million for another player, a good player but perhaps not as good as Bellingham. Meanwhile, we could not afford to get the Lavia deal over the line.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Caicedo is a very good player and it would be a great signing but I am having trouble joining the dots here
I agree, I meant their greed has prevented the player from moving anywhere as allegedly they agreed to let him go for 70m, but now are backtracking on it. Saints are just overpricing a player who has had 1 decent season
Difference is Brighton gained European football, you guys got relegatedJust jumping in here. Everyone seems to be under the impression that Caiciedo is this highly experienced, complete player in comparison. He's played less than 50 games in the Premier League. That's only 16 more games than Lavia.
Yeah I'm not sure this one's over the line yet. Just not sure about it generally to be honest. Something just seems a bit off. But here's hoping.Let’s get this one over the line…..Chelsea could still respond. What a **** window to buy midfielders in though![]()
Difference is Brighton gained European football, you guys got relegated
Achievement. Hints at a better player (potentially)Not sure why that is a difference when it comes to valuation. The actual difference is that you guys saw Caiciedo as being worth £61m more than Lavia. But, y'know, that's cool. Good luck with that!
Achievement. Hints at a better player
Not sure why that is a difference when it comes to valuation. The actual difference is that you guys saw Caiciedo as being worth £61m more than Lavia. But, y'know, that's cool. Good luck with that!
If this deal happens and we still buy another player (or two) before the window closes, there’s gunna be some embarrassed faces on here![]()

We'll have to wait and see. Bellingham was supposedly £110m but didn't he go for about £86m in the end? We've no idea how much this deal really is and we don't know how much Lavia will go for... That's of either player actually moves.
Just jumping in here. Everyone seems to be under the impression that Caiciedo is this highly experienced, complete player in comparison. He's played less than 50 games in the Premier League. That's only 16 more games than Lavia.
Look, no doubt Caicedo is a brilliant talent, and you'll (likely) have a fantastic player on your hands to complete what now looks a really exciting midfield for the season. Just the prices seem utterly mental taken alongside one another (and, as you say, adding the cost of Bellingham into the mix). Not your money, or mine though. I just would have thought £50m on Laiva and £61m still in the bank to spend reinforcing your defence would have been a bit smarter.

Just jumping in here. Everyone seems to be under the impression that Caiciedo is this highly experienced, complete player in comparison. He's played less than 50 games in the Premier League. That's only 16 more games than Lavia.
Also played in a WC. Also played in his home country. Also played at a higher standard in the prem.
Lavia only has 1 season at saints in pro football.
98 senior appearances in club football for caicedo
34 for Lavia