People ever so worried about the fact we’ve only got Connolly for one year and he might just leave on a free next summer to something/somewhere better while also being upset that he’s also not ‘Plan A’ and we could do better. Which is it? Relax the bed wetting. Just remember when we had Eaves and Magennis as our only two forwards and now we’ve got an Irish international, Colombian international and a Manchester City junior.
Connolly deal is good. If he wants to put himself in the shop window for a move elsewhere - then he has to deliver this season. If he doesn’t deliver, we haven’t over committed. Sensible. I hope the bed wetters understand.
According to Baz that solitary bloke on twitter saying we've paid 1. 2m that has been jumped on and accepted as truth by anyone searching for a reason to attack the club was 'significantly wide of the mark'.
Connolly's also available for Norwich despite supposedly being semantically unfit yesterday. On a side note, apparently, young Fenerbache winger Bora Aydinlik is happening on loan for a year. Can't wait to see what's wrong with this one and how Acun's playing football manager and hasn't learned and he's Sinik's lover and we've overpaid and he's got two broken legs and he's not tall enough and he's not physical enough and he's a satanist.
And as we all well know Baz knows **** all and gets all his info off here. That bloke on twitter is a more trustworthy source. And aside from that, I was replying to OLM’s comment saying he would bet his anal virginity (something like that) on the fee for Connolly being the same fee we get for Tetteh. And the fee for Tetteh is €1.5m which is roughly £1.2m so it all works out.
If Bird is included in Derby’s squad and plays against Wigan tomorrow I’d say the possibility of a transfer to city is way off. Also if he does play and has a blinder the price could possibly go up or at the very least they’ll hold out for what they’re looking for. Either way if we want the lad get a decent bid in, pronto
Careful you’ll be called a bed wetter syd total compliance and no questioning or discussing or debating or else
Just not sure what the point of citing his age is otherwise. I'm aware he's young, but if we're bringing him in on loan bit weird to start him in the U21s.
"He's viewed by City as a player with significant potential and should the loan prove successful, the Tigers will look to make the deal permanent. Aydınlık is the latest new arrival to City's academy following in the footsteps of Harry Vaughan who burst onto the first-team scene in April when he made his debut at Blackburn Rovers in the Championship, and more recently, Henry Sandat, who arrived this week." https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/spo...news/bora-aydnlk-hull-city-fenerbahce-8653289 I don't know if this counts as a first team loan or not, I assume City know what they are doing but, as always, TWT.
The key there are the words "should the loan prove successful, the Tigers will look to make the deal permanent".... should the loan prove to be successful Fenerbache will want him back. From that wording there is no option it seems to convert the loan to a transfer if it works out...
