Ok then, let's call him 18, 19 even 20, whatever makes this easier to understand, a 61 year old man possibly sending unwanted texts seen and verified by the BBC as having come from the presenters number, along with the previous 'story' from the parents. I'm not even suggesting criminality, I'm suggesting it don't sit comfortably with me from a moral perspective. We know with the BBC all about morals don't we, Jimmy Saville, Rolf Harris, Stuart Hall, and yet here we are once again, still making excuses for well paid presenters, all because it appeared in the Sun or Murdoch or something. In regards to what age do I feel is acceptable, that would be one where everything is out in the open, and there is no harm as a result being done to the younger individual, because of either payments or crack cocaine, there's no sending unwanted messages, there's no need for lawyers, it's a relationship where BBC Newsnight do not feel the need to carry out an undercover investigation on one of their own presenters, before The Sun even got involved. It also helps if you have parental approval even family approval, albeit on that part I accept many relationships do not. What the fook has voting got to do with this! It's just another excuse. I suppose at least this time the British Government will not have an excuse to take the young persons citizenship away.
The reason these degenerate homosexuals living double lives with a wife & family at home & a teenage crack smoking twink or 2 on the side . Is because they are compromised by blackmail, News readers will knowingly put on a suit in front of the cameras pretending to be a respectable trustworthy honest man. Where in reality the security services just make them read a script lying to our faces . He lied about everything from Savile, Blair's weapons of mass destruction ,Covid-19 & now Ukraine. The same with politicians they are what's known as script kiddies. The BBC is just an MI5 intelligence & propoganda outlet .
Even the MI5 boss was a nonce ffs They are all compromised. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...rison-funeral-after-child-sexual-abuse-claims Ex-MI5 chief avoided minister's funeral after child abuse claims
They get wealthy for not a lot off the backs of license payers, and use the public platform they've been privileged to have been given to moralise and preach, despite not doing any of the things they advocate others to do, and deride normal people for not doing. Despite their wealth and privilege, seemingly quite a few struggle with the pressure of 'work' and have mental health issues. The BBC sits back and does **** all about any of it, it just defends the institution.
It's a bit rich you calling someone else gammon, given your permarage on here, but hypocrisy does seem to be a default position for you safesapce stalking migrants.. Don't be cowardly and trying to shoot the messenger, show some balls and state your case. Is he wrong, if so in what way?
If a single mother has to choose between driving her kids to school on the way to work & pay £12.50p or buy groceries to feed them the "free" school dinners paid for by tax payers doesn't really fix the problem Sadiq created for them
All of the BBC kids presenters are put in the position because of the casting couch . If you don't let the BBC producers bum you then you don't get the gig & the dirty secret keeps them silent. Philip Schofield started off on kids TV, Richard Bacon , Rolf Harris , Sir Jimmy , Andy Peters will no doubt get exposed at some stage as a child molester.
The fact so many high profile types seemingly operated unnoticed should make the BBC sit up and think, especially as the latest gossip threw up a very long list of credible suspects, who nobody would have been shocked to find were perverts.
