You wouldn't take in a piss stained alcoholic, ex serviceman, down on his luck, any more than I'd take in some random immigrants, or anyone else I don't know.
You have no idea what I have done to support our veterans as I've never mentioned it on here. It's crystal clear you and your fellow ****wits are ****ing hypocrites though. Refugees are welcome here there.
Come on ladies, cut with the deflections (you're **** at them) Let's here your lived experience that you've applied to achieve the virtue you've been trying to signal. Do you not want the Afghans because they're not white? You have shown your racist credentials many times on here.
Good on you, for any support you've given, I donate a little bit each month to UNICEF and the British legion, as I don't earn much.
While you're busy deflecting and trying to reinvent what I posted yet again, how many Afghans or other migrants are you signing up for, or are they not welcome near you? I guess with you crammed in your grans box room, your options are limited, but I'm sure bunk beds would fit so you could apply for one.
*Gran’s I’d love to know where my ludicrously high taxes are going given public services are awful and debt is rocketing and I’m apparently now ought to take in a random Afghan to reduce the burden on our hardworking government.
Yup, that you are as thick as **** and a hypocrite. Why on earth you spent so long trying to get threads closed and people banned from safespace, only to stalk them over here is anyone's guess, but it really does make you look like a sad, lonely ****wit. But enough of that, how many migrants are you signing up for?
I said earlier, none. I complimented you on your support for veterans and how I give a little money each month too. Oh well.
Oh well what? Hopefully from this point forward you'll challenge those commenting on border controls that do not have the courage of their convictions to house migrants themselves. The issue isn't, nor ever has been about having zero migrants, it's been about having clear control over our borders to ensure that those coming in bring benefits and can co-exist within the existing society without demanding special rights for the culture that has clearly failed them. That would then put us in a much stronger position to help those that we need to help and support because of natural or other disasters and crisis. The ****wits just arguing 'not that' because they made some wrong conclusions about people in the past bring nothing to the conversation, yet you defend and side with them, which makes you look weak, foolish and hypocritical.
