Crime - part deux.

lol revenge porn?

That's a bit of a stretch.

 

So who am I going to believe the most, a grubby little paper that made some story up decades ago about Liverpool supporters or the BBC that has produced **** after **** after ****....now I wonder...

Tell yer what mate, I only need to know he sent that picture and that it's not fake to a 17 year old, then he's finished along with the BBC as far has I'm concerned.

 

What's the minimum age for reading this site?
Only ask because that pic has been posted on here, in affect sent to anyone viewing it.

 

The only pic I saw on here was the one Sucky posted from twitter and I've deleted it?

 

Oh and in answer to the question, scroll to the bottom of the page, the site clearly displays an 18+ sign.

please log in to view this image

 

You get the point then?
TBH you see more in adverts on TV and i feel i couldn't hang a man on that particular pic because all it shown was a man with grey hair, very little of the profile of his face to prove identity.

 

Yet i read it for weeks before deciding to join and never got asked my age

 

You clearly never saw the same pic as me.

 

So do you need parental guidance?

 

He has Tonto to keep him on the straight and narrow

 

I thought it was fosse tbh

 

Thankfully he's not a Newcastle fan.

 

Spitting image of him really

 

Is there something you want to tell us Diego?

 

Only that if i had to send a man to the firing squad based on that pic i would have to say case not proved.

That said, the fact a 17yo boy/girl can afford a lawyer to go against the Sun and it's parents does make you wonder if they really have received £35k

 

Tbh I've not bothered with this story at all, but I guarantee Philip Schofield's grateful for the breather.

 

They are 20 now, allegedly the accused is paying the solicitors

 

Reasons to not pay the tv licence #3463

please log in to view this image

 

Neither have i, just keep hearing snatches on the radio and it get's more bizarre by the day.