And what's your view (couldn't give a ****e about Vorders cos she doesn't post n here). Stop wasting your 600 tweet reads fella.
And you are paying for this through your taxes, wouldn't you rather the police investigate stabbings in London and such like?
This raises a couple of questions from me, but before I say... My thought process was that being a PEP he would be subject to periodic checks, and I wondered if not a direct link to his account, there was an indirect link ie somebody of significant importance has at some point recently passed monies through his account - the only reason I say this was because of Farage saying he was refused by other banks, and that would be the only connecting significance I could put on such account refusals, other than the already stated, minimum fund holding or as Farage claims they are targeting him, which I find hard to believe. Now to my two questions, why would anyone else know, (1) his financial holdings or if he was (2) offered another account. Surely that would be confidential information between him and the banks, and anyone that has disclosed such information would be subject to dismissal surely, if it was disclosed unofficially from within the financial sector?
I still want to know where his money is now, is it under his matress? Just shows what people can do to inconvenience those they don't like though. Getting more like China every day.
True. Well under CDD surely it would be frozen, if it was of such significance to refuse him an account. Surely he has just fallen below the minimum funding threshold and this has all been thrown out of proportion - no idea myself?
I'm going to order, sweet and sour Farage style. As soon as you start eating it, someone takes it away.
The ***** endorsing BBC Have they still got that statue outside their HQ by the ***** **** that raped his two young daughters and the family dog? ****ing **** of an organisation that should be ****ing twatted out of the bastarding Universe.
Do yourself a favour and order Char sui omlette but with onions not spring onions. You will never go back to anything else.
The water regulator has insisted it was powerless to stop Thames Water racking up mountains of debt due to a 'hands-off approach' under New Labour. David Black, chief executive of Ofwat, told members of the House of Lords industry and regulators committee yesterday that the watchdog should have stepped in back in 2006 to prevent the water firm's then-owner, Australian investment group Macquarie, from borrowing too much. But he said it was hamstrung by a lack of powers. New Labour is to blame for Thames Water's crippling debt pile, claims regulator Ofwat (msn.com)
