I can't see any reason why Kane's potential situation is being discussed here but there we go! I want less Premier League players to Bayern and more Wycombe to Rotherham transfers( preferably with some Saints ins and outs).
From what l remember Van Dyke was injured for 6 months or so we never had a full season from him and Liverpool signed him in an acrimonious transfer. I may be wrong though!
Yeah but equally he is worth more to us than £12m and at this stage in his contract it is for them to meet our valuation, not for us to meet theirs. If we needed to sell or Tinos contract was running out then that would be a different matter. I mean he could have a cracking season and Chelsea might activate the £30m buy back, so accepting a low ball offer from Newcastle doesn’t even appear to make financial sense on the face of it, and that is the only reason we would sell him.
^ This Wouldn’t make sense to sell him at a point where his market value has bottomed out due to an injury, rather than play him and see his value increase fast Assuming medical staff feel he has recovered 100% and don’t envisage a recurrence EDIT: And we obvs want him to stay for at least this season
Maybe ‘tough negotiating stances’ is better way of putting it Must work well for ours and the players interests
And TBH, if someone spells Van Dijk "Van Dyk" then they're probably not going to be a reliable source.
Nah. I know nothing about him, except he plays anywhere in the middle, even as DM, and had loads of clubs after him apparently, including Leeds and Arsenal.
