Sounds like the CEO was a ****ing idiot who didn't test it properly and ignored safety protocols. Virtually boasted about it and got everyone killed with his arrogance. RIP his poor passengers.
I saw on Twitter this morning somebody signed up for a dive last year, but pulled out when they saw three separate references to their potential death on the first page of the waiver Okay, first of all, if the contents of a waiver cannot be contained on a single sheet of paper and you are not about to have major invasive surgery, walk away. Here's a short list of waivers that can be done on a single side of paper - A visa waiver to enter the US - The waiver for skydiving, which has just the one reference to your potential death once you sign - The release form for any TV program, which can include anything up to your house being trashed by the Beadle's About crew Secondly, as hinted at before, most waivers that make repeated references to your potential death are those issued ahead of surgical procedures, for example when my mother had a pacemaker fitted it was six pages long and had 2-3 references to potential oopsies (which, given this was at mayday, was a very real concern...) - but those 2-3 references were over the entire document, not on the first page
Yep, it was bullshit: https://schoolsweek.co.uk/gender-row-school-none-of-our-pupils-identify-as-a-cat/
Fiona Bruce recently emphasised that QT screens all of it's audience members. This was also a Brexit special for purely Leave voters. They presumably checked her twice and yet...
And yet she's continuing to deny either making things up or being so gullible her pupils make stuff up knowing she'll make a bellend of herself
please log in to view this image Jesus Christ. There's also an email exchange doing the rounds between the CEO and a sub expert. He's explicitly warned that he's going to kill somebody and he ignores it.
What knowledge? We've known where the Titanic is since the mid-80s, and we sent submarines far, far deeper than that in the early 60s
Hey, remember when people tried to suggest the beanie-wearing testicle was a centrist? Looks remarkably like an easily-triggered far-right manbaby here...
