So, what's the verdict. I'm going for not guilty for the papers. That's not to say I think they're innocent. But haway Harry man, your evidence has been shyte. A tracker was found on his girlfriends car but only on his say so and no way of proving who put it there ... same seems to be the case with his other examples. And very poor indeed to 'do a Schofield' and bring Caroline Flack into it ... ... what he had to say about her was shameful.
Missed it but it doesn't surprise me from the other unsubstantiated waffle he's been prattling on about
The story is that he'd only met Caroline Flack once before and arranged a secret liason at her modest place in Fulham. He arrived and there were some photographers hanging around. He concludes that the only possible way they could've known is by phone hacking. Some people might think that a highly strung girl, who's only talent was being hobby, couldn't resist telling her mates etc etc etc. Arranging to see her at her place seems a bit odd tbh ... ... a big black limo, carrying Prince Harry, with a security detail might draw a bit of attention you'd imagine. As it's absolutely impossible to prove it seems callous to bring a dead girl's name into it imo.
Totally agree.....when you dance with the devil (the press) this is what you get. It seems in a heart beat he will throw anyone under the bus....it will be interesting somewhere down the road between him and his good lady who is the first one to throw the other under the same vehicle? Then what for him? Head home to a welcoming committee? I hope all this works out for him because if it doesn't he's f*cked.
Can't say I'm interested in the bloke, but it is almost impossible to escape the story. Bloke is clearly a liar and a blazing hypocrite. All that don't photo me ****e. He and his dodgy boiler of a wife would die of nervous angst if the paparazzi didn't follow them about. And he seems to have a very selective memory. Claiming everything was such a long time ago and that the questions were therefore somehow unreasonable because of this, yet just having had a book written for him , in which he rememvered everything in full HD. No sympathy for the Mirror mind. It's long been by far the worst rag in publication, but I'd be very surprised if they can pin anything new on them now. A pox on both their houses as far as I'm concerned.
You'd bet your house she'll be rid of him as soon as some gullible, uber rich fool turns up. Then, as you say, he's burnt every bridge he has for nowt.
I'm not one to speak on behalf of relationships as I have been married twice but from where I stand she has him right by the nads....
I have been reading this prediction for a long time now. Doesnt seem any closer than when it was first claimed with certainty. In the meantime, GB News blame her for Spotify job cuts. Of course our media have not got an agenda against her, not at all, never have. I would say you couldnt make it up, but of course they have.
I had a Meghan arrive in my family who latched onto my eldest son. She pulled him away from me, his brothers and his lovely NE relatives. She's now isolated him and produced two sons who she used as blackmail with me. She now has him exactly where she wants him and, if she decides to part, has left him stranded. It's a shame but I don't waste my time even thinking about it ... ... I only worry about friends and family who I care about. Life's too short and Harry will lol back, one day, and wonder why he ever threw his brother and dad into the long grass.
Are you saying she's innocent of all 'charges' and won't drop Harry like she's done with other people close to her ... ... I'd say she's earned any agenda tbh. Her mocking of the Queen, with he now, was enough for me and I'm not even a Royalist.
From what I have read, and it wont have covered EVERYTHING, by any means, much of Harry's evidence could be codensed into 'The Press were hacking everybody, so I KNOW, I just KNOW, that I must hav been included'. Actual evidence seems thin, to none existant. Had he still been anactive Member of The Royal Family, The Palace Staff would surely have advised him not to proceded to Court Action, with this. Much as Andrew was advised NOT under any circumstanses to go ahead with THAT INTERVIEW, Andrew, it's claimed, felt that with all his experience he could handle the interviewer, no problem. He went ahead dispite the advice and wrecked everything, Arrogance and overconfidence, We won't know till the Judge delivers his verdict, but Harry may well have made the same mistake, And the sad thing is that he is probably right, on some of the occasions, at least. But in Court, you have to PROVE that you are right.
If, as I believe, the Mirror group are found not to be guilty Harry will have to be careful with his next book ... ... if he repeats his claims he could well be sued for libel.
Prior to the trial they have accepted that in one case they engaged in illegal gathering of information about him. I think it is something like 28 of 33 reports they are refuting. So to an extent they have already accepted they did it. There are 4 or 5 people in this test case and only 1 claimant has been fully rejected by the newspaper. At least that is what I think was said by the lawyer for the newspapers.
Is this woman who is with your eldest son a narcissist? Sounds like a text book play they do......split the individual off from the herd.
Yeah I kinda thought......have something similar going on over here with my partner's daughter...and not to mention our good friend Prince H....not as though he has been split from the herd too right? However he might be a bigger narcissist than her.....imagine their conversations every night......"well I love me....who do you love"?
IF, costs go against him he may need to have another book written!! Though how that works in a case like this when some of the 'Petitioners' (?) might win and others lose, I have no idea,
I had no idea she had a deal with them. They did it same time as Rogan apparently, 25 million quid. There are currently 12 episodes up. Rogan does that in three weeks and his show continues to go from strength to strength. That deal worked for them. They had this bother with Netflix as well didn't they? Money was paid and they had to be forced to produce anything.
Not bothered about her in the slightest. Or him. But I can remember the wall to wall, fawning media coverage they both received before and after they were married, which of course comes with being a royal. It's the other stuff that comes with being a royal that didn't suit though it seems. It's not glamorous at all, and you don't live like a billionaire, especially as your not at the top. But that's the deal. They don't want it, so retreating to a walled compound in California seems to be their answer. But it has to be payed for, hence the absurd publicity seeking books and TV shows, pronouncing "Their truth" . I doubt they are bothered about me either.
