Well done coloured people you've introduced racial segregation in London https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...erous-precedent-promoting-black-audience.html Theatre show with 'all-black audience' that aims to explore race-related issues 'free from the white gaze' is accused of setting a 'dangerous precedent'
Doing a walk from Buck Palace to North London so got it into Victoria. Southern Rail is basically a bullet train compared to Thameslink.
Yeah it's very good. Not so good. Sitting on a pissy late train, that divides at Horsham and you're ****ed if you didn't listen to the fuzzbox tannoy address and you end up in St Leonard's on sea.
Black peepo don't go to theatres anyway, the only people that would watch the "show" are self hating white remain voter types .
Good old Aunty Beeb, lying yet again. Pupils are told at the beginning of the BBC’s revision guide that “every single person living in Britain today is descended from immigrants”. However, historians have raised corners with the BBC’s characterisation of arrivals to the UK, claiming that it is a “cliche” that has little basis in fact, with population being largely homogenous for most of British history. Cambridge historian Prof Robert Tombs said: “This has become a politically correct cliche, but it is misleading. “In modern times, Britain has been overwhelmingly a nation marked by emigration. Most immigration - or migration - was from other parts of the British Isles. “Occasional cases of immigration - such as the celebrated Huguenots, Jewish refugees in the late 19th century, or indeed the Kenyan Asians - were relatively few in numbers, and came over a relatively short period. “Continuous mass immigration - large enough to have a major demographic effect - only dates from the Blair era, and is completely unprecedented in our history.” Fellow historian Zareer Masani has argued that genetic research shows the population of the British Isles to have remained stable to millennia, with the many migrations listed by the BBC barely affecting the overall genetic makeup of British people until recent times. “If we go back far enough in time, we would probably find most of the world has at some point been colonised by movements of population. But it’s absurd to conclude from that that Britain, any more than France, China or India is a country of immigrants. “In fact, genetic analysis of the ancient DNA of skeletons in Britain shows that the population here has been remarkably stable since at least the arrival of Celts in the iron age three millennia ago. “The later arrival of Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Normans, Huguenots and Irish have all been shown by historians, archaeologists and geneticists to have involved tiny, very superficial new flows, mostly of either conquering aristocrats or refugees. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/ne...1&cvid=cfad9e7b2f8c40d6b535f07eeff6084b&ei=55
"Occasional cases of immigration - such as the celebrated Huguenots, Jewish refugees in the late 19th century, or indeed the Kenyan Asians - were relatively few in numbers, and came over a relatively short period. “Continuous mass immigration - large enough to have a major demographic effect - only dates from the Blair era, andis completely unprecedented in our history.” Blair caused more damage to this country than the German National Socialists, the Tory scum just carried on where Labour left off
600k in a year. Tories? "Voting will fix it"... all parties, sing from the same hymn sheet. Policy is set by others, not in the public gaze. When will you see it for what it is? All Western countries are following the same "policies".
50% of New York hotels are full of illegals, free food, free healthcare, free money & food stamps put up in rooms $500 a night hotels
