Match Day Thread Burnley vs QPR

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Alas, Armstrong predictably only on the bench.
How does Albert start ahead of Willock or Richards?
Madness
The answer is in the thread above. He does not want to play for Ainsworth. His attitude stinks and he is too thick at least to put himself in the shop window in the hope that a decent club comes in for him. Given what's been written I don't actually see why positions on the subs bench are even being wasted on Laird and Willock
 
The answer is in the thread above. He does not want to play for Ainsworth. His attitude stinks and he is too thick at least to put himself in the shop window in the hope that a decent club comes in for him. Given what's been written I don't actually see why positions on the subs bench are even being wasted on Laird and Willock
Agree about Willock. But just can’t understand Richards never starting when he always looks better than everyone else (not saying a lot, granted) when he comes on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodney and sb_73
Just shouted up to my lad ' have you seen the line up?'
He replied ' I'm not bothered anymore, doesn't matter who starts as it's just kick and hope either way!'
 
  • Like
Reactions: WBA2_QPR3
Adomah!!!
For ****'s sake. How ****ing clueless is Ainsworth?
As for all the rumours, I thought Laird and Willock were expelled?
 
The answer is in the thread above. He does not want to play for Ainsworth. His attitude stinks and he is too thick at least to put himself in the shop window in the hope that a decent club comes in for him. Given what's been written I don't actually see why positions on the subs bench are even being wasted on Laird and Willock

Maybe it's not all true?
 
I wonder if there’s any contractual or financial benefit by putting Laird on the bench. Maybe we’re so short on players he has no choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Highball_QPR
Knowing QPR, today’s game against title securing Burnley will go either of two ways:
1. A heartbreaking injury time defeat after a heroic 90 minutes performance in which we amazingly actually took the lead. As per Aguero/Man City scenario.

2. Conceding an early goal followed by an utter capitulation as Burnley gleefully run riot in a party atmosphere. Put your money on 6 or 7-0.

I’m afraid I can only see scenario number two.
Get the prayer mats out.

I anticipate such a result and can only “hope” we will be pleasantly surprised.
 
Wasn't expecting Laird to be on the bench. Surely, GA can fill the bench with youngsters!
Les confirmed that for some, not all, of our loan players we are obliged to select them if not injured under the terms of the contract. Perhaps the bench counts as selection.

Leicester City playing with 4 strikers today.

We don’t have 4 strikers, do we?
 
No Johansen. Laird and Willock as subs. The rumours may be true that there is a fallout between them and GA.
A manager should always play his best players regardless if he likes them are not a total disrespect for the fans, managers, players come and go fans are there to support their team for years and years.
No fan likes to read negative or dirty washing reports on their team in the media
 
I'm trying to watch the official live stream but the QPR website is being so slow. No other sites are this slow.
 
They hit the bar then blocked on the line after a chance a few minutes ago cleared off the line. We are like lambs heading for the slaughter at the moment.
 
This isn't sustainable for 90 mins. Already two off the line, bar hit, Seny save and a couple off target.