Personally, I'd take Gerrard over Hobbs, I don't think there's a massive amount between them, but Gerrard's threat from set pieces gives him the edge.
These people saying Hobbs over Gerrard are surely not serious? Gerrard is far better. They're both slow and **** in possession but at least Gerrard can head a ball and doesn't frequently pass it into the path of the opposition's striker. He's definitely the weak link in our otherwise usually very solid back 4.
in your dreams. Bamba maybe. The rest nowhere near PL standard. Koncheskey is slow. Fair in the tackle. Look at the goals against column AKCJ b4 you come on wum-ing. 8 of our goals conceeded have come in 3 games Which means the other 12 games Hull City have been very tight in.
agreed Gerrard is a better threat from set peices for now at least. Hobbs should be in the future. did not Gerrard and NP have a falling out or something towards the end of last season ?
