Rangers v Celtic

.

 

Says it all ^^^

I can think of 5 chances off the top of my head, including the Alf chance, two tav headers and twice Kent had an overload and took the wrong option (only counting this after you tried to shoehorn the Argentinian fluffed chance as an xG)

Then when you add in the chances from set plays, it's clear now why Rangers are firing ahead in the xG charts since Beale took over.

If I were you, I'd be very worried about next season, we all know Angeball blows up spectacularly in season 3.

 

.

 

We scored a header from open play

 

.

 

Doesn't count in Doidland buddy.

 

.

 

Laughable stuff



We call this a quadruple D

Doubling Down on Doing the Doid

 

.

 

A goal from a set peice would surely be, hit the corner and a goal occurs. Not hit a corner, cleared out the box, 6 touches outside the box, cross and goal.

Why are you Doiding so badly buddy?

Everything ok?

#itsoknottobeok

 

By doid logic, Tav's free kick was a penalty because he hit a penalty a couple of games ago and the free kick was in the same phase of play

 

.

 

.

 

Not one credible person ever will say Tav's second goal came from a set piece.

4 or 5 players touched the ball after the corner, the ball left the box, some Rangers player headed back to the halfway line.

Absolute nonsense once again Nudels.

 

.

 

.

 

.

 

It's absolute nonsense to say that Tav scored his second from a set peice

What you're saying is that Tav hit a corner, then scored a header from his set piece

The only one getting ended here is you fs

 

.

 

No quote reply = trying to avoid interrogation of his nonsense post

the smileys are because it is utterly laughable to suggest Tav scored a header from his corner