Can they make a thread about us not signing a striker, so I can get a bit of piece from it all. If they listened to the podcast, they'd know why we didn't sign one
We all know why we didnt. It was the rigidness if the model. Surely, we and fans can comment on its impact on the game. Or we not allowed to?
I don't mind folk commenting on it mate, but once the point is made, does it need to be made time and time again. We all agree we needed another forward. But most understand the clubs stance.
Yeah. Just when I watch a game like today I think it's wrong. My opinion like. But happy to get away with a point.
There is nothing wrong with a rigit model if its bringing the right players and most importantly the right characters into the club. Going by the podcast we had offers in for quiet a few forwards, no point signing or 6th or 7th option if we dont think they will improve us. It just gets a bit boring when it gets brought up all the time tbh but I dont mind folk giving their opinions though
It was a great point all things considered mate. This squads got some character, to battle back for the point.
Going to be honest here. I think the vast majority of 9s would have helped today. In the minority but sometimes we just need someone to take the hits to free up Amad and Roberts. They have decided against. Let's see how it plays out
Saying the vast majority of 9's is so broad. Its more about learning what runs to make to get the best out of the AMs, Gelhardt will learn this in time. I know you mentioned Chris Martin but he isnt winning us the game today so we would be no further forward. Hopefully Gelhardt gets a goal soon though as the pressure is on him, it'll make or break him