You've said before that Conte is underperforming because the squad is more than capable of coming top four. All down to Harry Kane?We have Harry Kane. There's the reason we outperform.
You've said before that Conte is underperforming because the squad is more than capable of coming top four. All down to Harry Kane?We have Harry Kane. There's the reason we outperform.
But despite all that we are still outperforming compared to our status in the money league so where are we way above average to make up for these shortcomings?
I kind of agree but just trying to see his logic of keeping but not playing certain players for the rest of the season. I think he trusts Sarr and Skipp to come in when needed. Like you I wish he would start them now and then but he’s shown he will always go with the same faces when possible.
If he plays Porro on the left to start Emerson Royal on the right then I’m done with him though![]()

I find it really weird to be honest, especially as he said a few weeks back about young players need to be first team ready in order for him to play them, how do they get first team ready if he doesn't allow them out on loan to prove themselves and develop? It's a really warped thought process that he has and I think a large number of young players are stagnating because of it, this is KWP but on a multiple scale.
As for Porro... I do half expect him to persist with Emerson, it wouldn't surprise me based off his decisions so far![]()
But that doesn't matter so much if the players who come in are nearly as good.That in itself is more risky, because he's playing players that will be running on or close to empty and more likely to drop a poor performance or suffer an injury.
You've said before that Conte is underperforming because the squad is more than capable of coming top four. All down to Harry Kane?
My only answer for Conte not playing them is that he’s off in the summer so purely focused on players he rates right now.
The next manager has lot of potential to work with so you’d hope the club will get it right and there will be some sort of aligned vision.
That said, if Kane is sold then Spurs are ****ed
You must log in or register to see media
Spurs should be all over this
You must log in or register to see media
Some context on why it’s a loan with obligation for Porro and how it’s a bit similar to the Lo Celso deal (which also IIRC dragged out) as it’s about timing the deal right for the selling club.
Let’s hope that’s the only way it’s similar to the Lo Celso deal…
I suspect that "creative accounting" to help Sporting CP
is the primary reason for the timespan of this one
(and does Levy effectively now have an IOU from them) .
How much less than the purported release clause price
Spurs have effectively managed to save (if at all) is another story ...
It's been said for a while that we were working with Sporting to work out a way that they keep more of the fee and screw The Sheikh Mansour Team, as at least three weeks ago there were stories zipping about saying that if we paid €40m Sporting would (somehow) keep a bigger percentage than if we paid the €45mYou must log in or register to see media
Some context on why it’s a loan with obligation for Porro and how it’s a bit similar to the Lo Celso deal (which also IIRC dragged out) as it’s about timing the deal right for the selling club.
Let’s hope that’s the only way it’s similar to the Lo Celso deal…
No chance he'd join us in my opinion, he'll surely want a move to a top side?
Think Barca have been interested for a while, just whether they manage to find the money down the back of the sofa to buy him.
It’s a pipe dream and won’t happen but this would be a VDV type of signing if it happened.
i agree. I wanted Potter when we appointed Mourinho....and Nuno....and Conte. That appointment would have made sense.
Appointing Conte and baulking at throwing money, no object, at him, made as little sense as when we appointed Mourinho......
...and here we are!