So the French can sell us horse meat and pretend it's chicken ? The whole premise that we are buying ****ed up produce from the EUROPEAN UNION kind of means the checks and balances inside the EUROPEAN UNION are being ignored . You can buy Bush meat from African shops in Birmingham, frozen monkeys and all sorts of delicious **** . It's illegal but English people aren't hoodwinked into buying it
They shoot themselves straight through their own feet every time and demonstrate their ignorance. No wonder they avoid posting their own views on the whole.
Without being a member of the EUROPEAN UNION, unscrupulous butchers inside the EUROPEAN UNION can send us their substandard meat . Isn't that the fault of the EUROPEAN UNION ? That's like saying because we left the EUROPEAN UNION French people piss in the wine they send over .
Aye because Romanian shysters are right keen on sticking to EU rules so having no border checks in the UK until the end of 2023 is ticketyboo. Not only do you not know how legal stuff works you seem awfy naive when it comes to how illegal stuff works. Probably because you're an idiot. Thanks for playing.
Didn't we leave the EU to take back control of our borders so unscrupulous folk couldn't get their dodgy kin folk and stuff in? Is it the fault of the EU that unscrupulous butchers in the UK are buying this substandard unchecked meat?
That's borderline racist , Romanian people are no different from all the other EUROPEAN UNION member states . The unhelpful stereotype that Romanians are dishonest is a far right trope and completely baseless.
If a UK butcher purchases a shipment of substandard meat , they have a business address to report the problem . If the meat is unfit for unhuman consumption it's unfit inside the EUROPEAN UNION and all through it's journey. They clearly wouldn't get any repeat business either
Fùcked up again by showing you the truth of the matter? You do know that Hull only has a BCP for fisheries goods only? You should, it says so in the link you posted. Strange you would post that when the discussion was about meat. Do you not even know that meat doesn't come under fisheries? Talk about fùcking up, even by your standards this has been a doozy DuMDum. Back in your box, indeed!
The truth? I posted that in the links you ****ing ******. One day, like the monkeys and typewriters, you may end up posting something that's accurate...until then, it's as funny as **** watching you flop about. You really do love making a fool of yourself to try and get some attention don't you.
I ****ing hate them , especially the fat old ****s that waddle about in flip flops and socks even if it rains. I would happily put them in a big Bosch oven, every last Roma gypo scum.
You were discussing how meat was coming into the country unchecked. You posted a link to the port of Hull in which it clearly states that the checks done there are for fisheries only. There's only one person making a fool of themselves here and no amount of projection will stop it from being you ya daft cùnt.
Stalin had the right idea. Don't even get me started on Ukranians ffs. Bulgarians seem fine though. Creations as well. Poles are hit and miss.
Only if you ignore the clear fact that I said it was for fish only, and that the rest was checked at the Country of origin. In your stupidity and ignorance, you are confirming what I posted, which shows how clueless farked's post was, and as Dunc has pointed out, you are implying that it is the EU that would be failing in your scenario. Now, get back in your box you ****ing numpty, your attempt at spin has gone as badly as they usually do.
So you have no source, you thick ****. A quick google will tell you the numbers of staff checking food premises, and they are different to the ones checking the ports, as that tends to be Port Health based, and currently relies on a certificate of inspection from the Country of origin. https://www.hullandgoolepha.gov.uk/... the Port of Hull,PHA using the IPAFFS system. https://www.cieh.org/media/5249/cieh-workforce-survey-report-for-england.pdf You really don't get anything right do you. " Here's what you posted. Point out where you said Hull was for fisheries only.
It's in the link I posted, and I stated it explicitly in the later response. You're actually making the same points I made (albeit you're making a real mess of it) and demonstrating that Farked's post was pure bollocks. I posted links to back up my points, which you have supported, so you really need to be tackling farked, as he is the one you're disagreeing with, and he is yet to post anything to back up his claims.
Why is there such anger in this thread? We're supposed to be united in our contempt for non-General Chatters
