I am a little taken aback by your response. I did back it up, I said in most of your posts you churn out dirge about American Politics. As you have made north of 900 posts you wouldn't expect any right minded person to go through and list them when doing something that is no more than a pastime would you?
LOL No you didn't - your response was to positively dodge the question. You were/are completely unable to cite a single example. A bit like saying that everyone thinks that Adan Forshaw is the best midfielder in England. To which you respond by asking who. Then to be told "anyone who watches football". So c'mon, back up what you say. From what you say "most of them", it shouldn't be exactly an overly onerous task even for someone with your inability to articulate thoughts into comprehensible English.
Ok, your posts 31553, 31558, 31560, 31563, 31564, 31567, 31575, 31577 & 31594 all contain dirge about American politics and that is just from a quick glance between last Wednesday and Sunday. Now, because you obviously consider yourself of superior intellect, I am guessing that you have worked out what I haven’t said is that those with views opposing yours are not also posting dirge, you see, to me it all is. Therefore, my assertion is 100% backed up with proof. If you care to disagree, I will ask you for proof that it isn’t dirge - that would seem only fair would it not? You think I “support” Roger - my turn, show me where. Sure this is the anything goes thread but it is now almost exclusively both sides posting dirge or trading insults (I can point you to those posts as well if you struggle to understand that too). Shame really because it makes it so much harder to find the odd interesting posts that do get posted.
OK, what "dirge" do you cite ? (by "dirge", I assume you mean slanderous/false assertions). What was said, that you think is slanderous or outright false ? Do you simply regard any comment, of a political nature, as "dirge" ? Or just any comment attacking Trump ? I can debate you over any point I've made (or video posted). I seriously doubt your ability to present a lucid contrary view, much less one backed up by anything other than biased opinion. Not superior intellect, but knowledge/experience/education. Have you ever studied politics or even watched any TV shows about US politics ? What grounds do you have to support a contention that you know anything about what you're talking about ? Because you echo his thoughts. But if you disagree with his views, please advise what he's expressed that you disagree with. I'd be happy to debate US politics with you As I type this, there's quite the drama in the US House of Representatives.
I notice the feathered-****wit ignored the question asked yet then supplied its own asking for evidence.
Then read my reply. I said pretty much what you did: "Because you echo his thoughts. But if you disagree with his views, please advise what he's expressed that you disagree with."
I told you none of this was true. Eleanor Williams, 22, guilty of lying over Asian grooming gang claims https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...f?shareToken=79da120e2f5d707689be8d7881da09a8
This guy persists in not being a racist homophobic misogynistic hard right conspiracy believer. He clearly can’t be a proper Not606 LUFC poster and should be banned.
TBF......if you are prepared to smash a hammer into your dial to cause those injuries that alone should get you on speed dial to the mental health assessment unit pronto.......if I had a hammer, I'd smash my effing face in
Dirge has nothing to do with slanderous / false assertions so that’s your reply dead in one. Dirge is taken from a hymn, song or piece of music especially one to accompany a funeral or memorial rites, a funeral dirge. These are slow, solemn and mournful. Taken from this is the informal use towards music and the written words that are considered (this is my favourite bit) too slow, miserable or boring. So, in answer to the rest of the dross you have written, I have zero interest in any of it because you have just written your own essay proving my point
Are but you see this is known as the swerve - that is not evidence. As you demand from others, I want references to actual posts I have made echoing his thoughts. To date, you have supplied none. If I wish to advise what Roger has expressed that I disagree with, surely it would be polite of me to address those with Roger not you would it not? This is based on the technicality that it would be none of your business.
The best approach is to ignore, remove the oxygen of attention that fuels his giant ego. He obviously gets gratification from deriding and insulting all who engage with him, and coupled with his sophomoric humour, his posts are vacuous.
