Good point, even if we are still paying his wages, I doubt he'll spend much of the next 3months with us, the opp and rehab will all be handled by Chelsea
But he's a forward who doesn't score many goals based on his stats. So what does Rosie see in him, of course knowing him from Brighton, but what does he bring to the table?
Tufan and Sinik be loans or transfers? We are not gonna recoup 6/7 million are we? If we send out on loan get the wages paid for that’s a huge loss of money. If they both go would need us finding a new number 10 and winger. Maybe on loan if they both go on loan?
Be really disappointed to see both Tufan and Sinik leave. If anything, it reflects poorly on Acun because he personally pushed for both of these transfers. He made out that Tufan could turn his career around here and Sinik was hyped as a player for the future.
There is a real player in Tufan, but is somewhat of a luxury given where we are at. 100% should Try keep him. Just need him to work harder off the ball. Who the fcuk is enquiring about Tetteh who has been injured for months. Is that his agent being asked to 'get him outa here'????? Sinik.....don't care. Oscar. If we have ambition we should just refuse.
i would like tufan to stay, you can see he has that extra bit of quality that can show at times expensive signing though if he's not going to be a starter, maybe that's the thinking? sinik just hasnt seemed to grasp the championship, he's showed bits here and there but think best for both if he moved on
Tad harsh, not every player will work out every time. Acun/the club wasn't going to get every transfer correct especially in their first year. Financially we should at the worst break even on them. If that's the case then we learn and move on, investing that money in better and perhaps more suitable players for us
It’s strange because I thought Tufan looked sharp and up for it against Blackpool. We looked worse when he went off in that game. He also started on the right against Blackpool and Longman, whilst a grafter, has looked poor on the right in the last few games. Sinik has hardly been given a chance imo. He hasn’t done much in the minutes he has played but Longman can be poor for 3-4 games and still start. Longman must be a better in training.
I think ( and this is my personal view as opposed to knowing anything ) we need to free up some cash and the club/Rosie has looked at finding the player(s) that A - can be sold for a decent amount B - Rosie/the team can afford to Sacrifice to perhaps strengthen elsewhere When you look at both of those then Tufan and sinik do fit the bill. I'd rather lose those then oscar for example.
Sadly I think Tufan waved his goodbyes to the away at Wigan today, he will be a loss to the team. I don't think he fits into Roseniors planning/tactics to well but selling him will be a mistake as he gives the team a bit of ****housery and an edge. If anyone wants to buy Oscar then £10miillion is the asking price or they can do one.
That does make sense. Just be a shame to see them both go. Tufan averages a goal every 5 games as a midfielder and he has quality, whilst Sinik has been unfortunate with his injury and never really been given a run in the team to prove himself. I’d keep both until summer at least but the club may have other plans if they want to do business in January.