It's probably just the way the camera is set up to take the picture. Something to do with the lens so that wide panoramics are curved round. Looks ****.
Throughout all the universe stuff I've ever seen or read, one thing amazes me in it's absence, which leaves me still to consider the existence of god. I've said endless times that the Earth and everything on it is but a mere grain of sand on an enormous beach, over a distance that is hard for the human brain to even contemplate. Yet despite our search and with technology that supposedly looks back to the beginning of the universe, there is still that one thing we have never found elsewhere, life! Even scientists will tell you by the law of averages it should exist, other human life or something of similar existence, but unless NASA is lying to us, we've found nowt of significance. It's like a selection process has taken place that has put us at the forefront of everything, I struggle to believe even with the best imagination that nature alone would create such an existence, unless it was intentional. Nature works its wonders, so why only life on Earth, why has nature not given birth to creatures that live in space or at the very least on other planets, and with the age of our universe, we should have seen them by now, so it can only come down to two things, either we are all living a great lie, that we only know what we are told or our devine creator intended it that way. To say we are but a fluke of nature, could be the biggest denial of them all. Just food for thought.
Maybe you should read some of david icke books.......he's mocked for an opinion whilst everyone is fine with thy load of if but and maybes.
They wanna change the dna structure of humans......beware of medical advances if its not natural hey.
Just because we haven't detected anything (yet) on the microscopically small areas of the Moon & Mars that we've actually been and had a cursory look at, doesn't mean that there isn't any somewhere else. It's not like we have star trek life scanner technology (which could only detect life from orbit anyway), we have radio telescopes and can just about detect planets in local star systems from the wobble and periodic dimming of light from the star. Using those we can kinda guess the volume and mass of it, but have no idea if were right or not as we can't actually see them. How the **** could we detect life on far flung corners of the galaxy, let alone the universe, with such tools? We can only guess at the necessary conditions for the creation of life, and although 14.5billion years is a long time for a human, is it a long time cosmically? If the current theories are correct, the universe has been constantly evolving since the big bang and it's gone through a few stages to get to this point, stages in which most of the elements did not exist. It's possible those necessary conditions haven't existed until 'recently'.
Alien life don't exist and if it did, it would have destroyed us by now, like everything else that is destructive in life. You only have to look at the way we hang an animal and strip it bare in some butchery, that's what would happen to us, if the little green men found us, we would be mass farmed or mass destroyed dependent on their taste, I'd be well-aged beef - funnily everyone would find religion again, praying to save our souls so I'll put in a good word for you Ern, and say he aint a bad lad. You've got more chance of West Ham winning the Champions League then ever finding an extraterrestrial.
By 'alien life' you mean highly advanced super intelligent life then, one that can travel through the interstellar 'void'. For what purpose would they come? A species that advanced wouldn't need anything we have.
You have no idea what an advance super intellingent life would be interested in or where they would come from nor the type of environment they would need to thrive. If they were that super intelligent and can travel through an interstellar void, why would they hide from us? It's an unknown, because there is no evidence whatsoever that they exist, not a shred of evidence anywhere. This is all in your mind Ern, you been watching too much Star Trek bro.
And neither do you, so I ask again, why would they come here? For all we know visiting Earth may be the galactic equivalent of visiting Grimsby, a backward **** hole on a sprial arm of a insignificant galaxy that no one wants to go to becausae its **** and not worth the ridiculous cost in energy to get here (that's if its even possible to cross the interstellar void at all). There's nothing here that a race, advanced far enough to get here, would want that they probably couldn't make themselves.
Why would I know why they would come here, I don't even pretend they exist, it was YOU that promoted them to being super intelligent, I merely said that we haven't found life, any life and somehow you wanted it to prove some point like you do, that they do exist in some far flung corner. If there isn't another Earth out there, like any explorer you would go and look at it, purely because it's different - for example, we go and look at cold/hot dusty planets with fook all on them, because that's what we do, like littered tourist trails to the top of Everest. Now we plan to colonise those planets like stepping stones, like any alien life as of yet to be found, we have no idea whether it eats or breath or what allows it to exist. Once they've found these super intelligent beings come back to me Ern, they better hurry up though if you want to prove me wrong, the clock is ticking down on our lives.
Anyway... According to an index developed in 2015, Earth is not the most habitable planet found yet. Kepler-442b, a rocky near-Earth-sized exoplanet that is 1206 light-years away from Earth, has a rating of 0.836. On the other hand, Earth has a rating of 0.829 please log in to view this image
