Nope, definitely yours. You have just intimated that Trump voters are mostly thick uneducated people, given that he has just served a term as President what does that say about America as a whole?
Really Care to back up you ad-hom attack with anything resembling evidence ? Or perhaps you're just exhibiting the herd mentality of the terrace, who'll scream that the Democrats in general, and Biden in particular, are "stupid". You don't know why let alone articulate it into intelligible sentences, but everyone around you says so. I won't hold my breath, in anticipation of any intelligent reply. Nope, you've just confirmed your inadequacies at reading comprehension At no time have I said that Trump's supporters lack intelligence, or possess less than Democrat party supporters.
Would you like to say why you made this particular statement then? Most Trump supporters tend to be white males with no further education.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy goes to meet the POTUS, in a T-shirt??? Very classy. He's a bit like the Irwins of crocodile fame who cannot go anywhere unless they are wearing khaki shirts and shorts, dead afraid that no-one will recognise them in proper clothes.
As I thought - you lack reading comprehension Where in that does it suggest that Trump's supporters are unintelligent or as you put it "thick" ? Hint: it doesn't Where does it suggest that they are uneducated ? Do you actually know what is meant by "further education" ? Did you miss this bit ? "...that's not to say that many high earning professionals don't count themselves as a part of the MAGA crowd." Maybe you should take advantage of an adult literacy class ?
House Democrats have already released a 39 page summery....which shows that "billionaire" Donald paid ZERO dollars in federal tax in 2020...and in 2 other years, in the last 6, he paid just $750 !!!! And this from a supposed billionaire.
So, I am taking it Diego and Roger are one? I mean, if your insults are all replies, that would have to be the case? Same as the World Cup thread I guess? Or, possibly, you are just the spiteful tosser in the playground after all
Yes which is why i am wondering why you mention the level of education in "most" Trump supporters, is it relevant in some way? Are you implying that lesser educated people (more likely to be in low paid jobs) are more likely to vote for Trump whilst "many " higher educated and more affluent people may vote for him.
Or possibly you're emotionally tied to the aforementioned posters and are incapable of exercising independent judgment ? But I tell you what, please pick out any of my "insults" and see if you can find any NOT made in direct response to personal attacks, by those of your intimate friends.
Not sure you are cut out for this forum mate, "emotionally tied to posters" This place is everyone for themselves and **** the rest.
Because that's what studies have shown that, generally, Trump's base supporters are white males with no college education. Not that they're incapable of gaining any. Studies also show that, generally, the more further education a US citizen gets, the LESS likely they are to be a Trump supporter. (though as I said, many well paid professionals do count themselves as part of the MAGA crowd) And yes, people with higher education do tend to have higher paying jobs That's actually the whole point in going to college.
No, I do seem to feel that there's definitely a clique on here. Roger the PP does indeed have his vociferous defenders.
So basically you are hiding behind "studies" ? Probably why you felt it important to mention the level of education of supporters then threw in the get out clause of "many" better educated agree with them. You're an open book mate, you think you are better than Trump supporters and try to show it by mentioning the level of their education.
Nope, "studies" make up this little thing called "evidence" Without evidence, all you have is baseless personal opinion The same as an evangelical Christian - it is people like them, and you, who "hide" behind opinion/faith without evidence People don't hide behind evidence when it supports their argument. They cite it as their authority. Doubtless you think that a barrister in a court room trial is "hiding" when he presents evidence to the court What a weird reasoning process your mind must have. Nope, I mention it, because that's what studies show and the more educated/less politically ignorant you are, the less likely you are to support Trump. Personally I do think that Trump supporters are politically ignorant, and don't vote for him based on and rational criteria Doubtless you consider yourself superior to the followers of political parties you don't support.
Certainly not, we all have our own reasons for voting as we do regardless of educational standards. You however seem to rely on studies to intimate that lesser educated people don't vote the same way as you and by throwing in the odd better educated person also votes the same way seem to think this absolves you prejudice. You sir are a self important ass who seems to have no idea that people may vote on their life experience and not on who they were told to vote for.
This doesn't mean he has done anything illegal. We had a billionaire here a few years back who openly admitted to paying as little tax as possible, but all within allowable limits. From memory, one year he paid $12.50. I don't blame him, if I could get by paying less tax I would, wouldn't you? It probably cost Trump and Packer a quid in accountants' fees but, hey, they could afford it and in the end it saved them millions.
Exactly! So if you don't think that supporters of political parties you don't support, are stupid, why do you presume that attitude to exist in others ? Nope, and what do you believe that studies, based on interviews with voters in the USA, are less valuable than YOUR personal opinion ? Your opinion is worthless, unless backed up by some evidence Evidence like studies into the make up of political support, in the USA. No, you sir, are politically ignorant and who forms opinions based on nothing more than myopic opinion and bigotry - and probably a shed load of peer pressure. People ***do*** vote along social lines Friends dress alike, share similar views, vote alike, and if religious, they go to the same church And people also generally vote the same way their parents did and if religious, share the same faith. Of course there is social mobility and people's opinions can change. My own father was a coal miner and staunch Labour supporter. He got out of the mines and went to work for an engineering company and along the way changed his political views. But that's the exception; and you ***can*** make broad generalizations with regard to large demographics. But go ahead and eschew stuff like facts and evidence, your ignorant opinions are probably way more sound. /s
$0 federal tax, from a supposed "successful billionaire" Negative income of over $50 million over 6 years ? I wonder why Trump has fought tooth and nail for years to prevent his tax returns ever being made public ? You are of course right, he's innocent until proven guilty, though it has to be said he secured large loans from banks that he personally guaranteed over the years too. His company, the Trump Organization, was recently sued for $250 million for tax fraud, by the Manhattan DA. That doesn't help convince you that Trump's been paying his fair share, does it ? Also, I'm not sure the banks would've loaned hundreds of millions to a man who lost nearly $10 million a year.
There are two main reasons a billionaire would pay so little tax. 1. Tax avoidance. While this is not illegal it could leave a sickening taste in the throat of honest hard working people who earn their money and pay their appropriate dues in taxes. Mr Trump could, and probably does, have very clever accountants who know all the legal ways to help their clients avoid paying tax. On a positive note who would want to pay more tax than they legally have to? 2. Tax evasion. This is not legal and can involve all sorts of methods to place your money out of reach or visibility of the IRS. It's also possible that in order to pay such low taxes you could be involved in a bit of both 1&2. Either way it's difficult to see how, if Mr Trump did in fact pay such low taxes, it would be popular with voters. Perhaps his hard core supporters could however see it as just another example of how he challenges the establishment and wins! Alternatively his wealth could actually be based on falsehoods and illusion and about as stable and substantial as crypto currency. The full report when published may enable clever people to come to some conclusion about why he doesn't pay as much tax as you would imagine he should.
