https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...thirds-medical-research-wrong-fraudulent.html Daily mail… never trust experts… well unless they are saying something we agree the **** out of.
What the **** has a 2010 article on health professionals got to do with Harry Judas and Lady Megbeth?
please log in to view this image Robert Jobson @theroyaleditor This photograph used by@Netflix and Harry and Meghan to suggest intrusion by the press is a complete travesty. It was taken from a accredited pool at Archbishop Tutu’s residence in Cape Town. Only 3 people were in the accredited position. H & M agreed the position. I was there. please log in to view this image 5
Burnside @BurnsideNotTosh Wonderful to see that wearing a swastika, calling someone a "paki" and chaingunning Afghani villagers are no obstacle to picking up an award for your work on anti-racism.
Was that the mother whose hand Prince Charles held, escorting her to the registry, after walking her daughter down the aisle because she refused to invite her own father to her wedding (or indeed the rest of her family, whom she's disowned because they're not grand enough and know the truth behind her lies)?
I am completely neutral on all this bollocks, it’s of no interest or value to me except for a kind of rubber necking fascination not with the royals but with the hysterical reactions to them. However, this morning 14 of the first 15 stories in the electronic version of the Times (including front page, two comment pieces and a TV review, right at the front of the paper) were all about this Netflix programme. A bit later the leader column was devoted to it as well. I presume the editor of the Times thinks that his average reader is deeply fascinated in this crap (which of course makes me a below- or perhaps above - average reader) and he may well be right. In which case we are doomed. I was at risk of developing RSI scrolling through this drivel, I pity the journos who entered the profession dreaming of being the next Woodward or Bernstein, get to work at the august Times and end up covering nonentities for the titillation of voyeurs of other peoples misery. The one story on something else was about the Ambulance service strike. The nurses don’t get a mention until deep into the edition. The cynical might imagine it’s a plot to distract us from the real stuff.
