For me he has never produced at the nitty gritty end.
Eddie Howe would be a fantastic appointment.
Eddie Howe would be a fantastic appointment.
Based on what, spending over £200m at Newcastle to do well? Different at International level where you can’t buy what you need. Howe is too inexperienced at the moment.For me he has never produced at the nitty gritty end.
Eddie Howe would be a fantastic appointment.
It’s hard to be too critical of him as he has taken us a long way, but I do see your points as valid. Too often he hasn’t had the attacking options front of mind for me, or doesn’t know how to implement them. Looking at the attacking talent on the bench when we needed to chase the game, yet he keeps Declan ‘square or back pass’ Rice on. Why not bring on attack minded players like TAA or Maddison to worry the French. My worry if we stick with him is, he won’t change that thought process, so we will probably never progress.Managers results depend imo mostly on players ability. England have an abundance of talent and yet for example the French with less talent prevailed. He should be rid of just for the way he sent the team out 1st half against the French.
He is, imo, a nice man who has and will continue to waste the unbelievable talent at his disposal.
Based on what, spending over £200m at Newcastle to do well? Different at International level where you can’t buy what you need. Howe is too inexperienced at the moment.
I know it is just a single call but for me Southgate should have insisted that Kane not take the second penalty which makes me question his entire set-up and substitution policies. Kane absolutely smashed the first one past his team-mate at Spurs but asking him to be put under even more pressure, in a situation that could have taken us further in the World Cup, was totally wrong. Southgate should have gone with a player that wasn't well known to Lloris to put he onus on the keeper and not the taker. There is no doubt that we have some fantastic players, including some for the future, but I don't think we used our talent both starters and subs to the best advantage, especially when you consider that France were missing some key players.
On a side note I believe we should have been given some other possible fouls in the box but the referee and VAR looked the wrong way. I don't think it's an excuse but rather a comment.
International football is possession based, if you give it away it’s difficult and tiring to get it back. To be successful as you seem to want us to be, and rightly so, you have to play that way. If you just go hung how against the better teams, especially, you will just get picked off.Spot on Mike -Kane should never have taken the second - i said he will miss it should have been taken by another who the keeper did not now so well.
As for the sideways and backward **** how boring.
That world cup was there for the taking and i do blame southgate for this cock up.
International football is possession based, if you give it away it’s difficult and tiring to get it back. To be successful as you seem to want us to be, and rightly so, you have to play that way. If you just go hung how against the better teams, especially, you will just get picked off.
The game against the USA imo we were a bit too negative, but a draw meant we were through to the next round, this took the pressure off the last game, which freed us up to win the wales game 3-0 and win the group . Sometimes you have to be a bit savvy.
Agree to a point, however there is so much at stake it’s understandable, a fine balance to be positive when a mistake can be so costly. On the whole I think the balance was about right, even the France game we had chances but didn’t take them.Fully understand not going gun ho-but some of the play was so feeble almost frightened to pass forward.
For me a lot of the football was negative .
If someone else took the penalty and missed what would you be saying? I can bet it was “Kane should not be refusing to take them”Spot on Mike -Kane should never have taken the second - i said he will miss it should have been taken by another who the keeper did not now so well.
His record of taking penalties for England is immense, he’s human, eventually he’ll miss, he’s the captain too so only right he took responsibility. I don’t blame him at all.If someone else took the penalty and missed what would you be saying? I can bet it was “Kane should not be refusing to take them”
I don’t agree with taking the knee, never have, but if the players want to, so be it. I don’t think you can blame Southgate, unless of course he’s making them do it.Haven't watched any of the WC, but if England are still taking the knee, which makes me want to physically vomit, then Southgate should go just for that reason alone