No because although he’s still a good player, realistically the only position he could play would be up top instead of Kane and he wouldn’t want to be Kane’s backup.
And don't forget the toxic fandom he brings with him We've already had one Portugeezer with a toxic fandom associated with us in the last couple of years...
Yeah the circus around him isn’t worth the hassle either. Financially it would probably benefit the club though
Poor guy can’t even displace one of Rashford, Martial or a choice of one or two youngsters these days, he’d be well and truly ****ed trying to displace Kane, Son or Kulu.
He had to write a leagal statement for the US old bill about an allegation of rape against him. The bits I read were really disturbing imho. Don't expect everyone to have my take on it tbf but was just answering spurlocks question
I think we're beginning to see a clear pattern emerge in terms of which targets are from Fabio's desk and which are from Antonio's. I'm glad they seem to work well together as otherwise they have totally opposite visions in terms of recruitment.
Given that Malinovskyi and Gordon are on the menu, we're also seeing Paratici starting to spin up a few plates Same goes for Weston McKennie and Davide Frattesi both being linked recently
Paying for Anthony Gordon should almost be a criminal offence. They’d probably want a similar fee to what we paid for Richarlison too… £120m on those two would basically be the newer version of almost £100m on Ndombele and Lo Celso. Club needs to see the light here.
Plays (played?) for Utd, did an interview with Piers Morgan and has a ego larger than the moon. Also quite rapey. Allegedly.
