So another post excusing the Tories of blame ... ... as if you deliberately set out to prove my point. As for your Braverman example, she's 100% to blame for this ... “I would love to have a front page of the Telegraph with a plane taking off to Rwanda,” she said at this week’s Tory party conference. “That’s my dream, it’s my obsession.” Dear me, an obsession to do something that so many people, from lawyers to religious leaders, see as immoral ... ... not to mention something that may never be allowed to happen.
Nope, another post asking for blame to be apportioned where it lies. Breaching security regulations? 100% to blame. Not solving a problem in two months nobody else has been able to solve, Labour or tory, for 20 years?
So another post stating Labour haven't elaborated on their policies, previously no policies, excusing the Tories of blame ... ... as if you deliberately set out to prove my point. Cheers Smug.
So the Braverman email didnt have sensitive info in it after all? I cant keep up with this one. Sounds like Truss might have tried to stitch her up. Bit of deflection maybe? You have to laugh at the journos though dont you? 'But we were told by sources it was sensitive info that is why we reported it'. Might want to go and moan at your sources, rather than the number 10 press officer. Journos seem to be constantly racing to beat each other to the next juicy tweet, rather than stopping to think about whether their info might be duff. Much more interested in whether Braverman refused to sign off hotel for Manston. Again journos trying to outdo each other with how many sources they have.
As I said... Sir Roger Gale Cons saying it's turned into a ****-show and should never been allowed to develop and possible intentional by the Home Sec. In June it was working fine, along comes Braverman and she's either incompetent or, as Sir Roger believes, has an agenda
I'm not asking her to do that. I'm blaming her for supporting an idiotic scheme that will never work. The fact is that, under the Tories, the situation is getting much worse not even slightly better despite promise after promise. That's a fact.
Do you really believe that Fell Top? What about the six documents she sent to her private email account that are not included in the current breach?
Braverman failed to sign-off on hotel bookings and could be deemed to have broken Statutory duties. Sir Roger Gale Cons saying it's turned into a ****-show and should never been allowed to develop and possible intentional by the Home Sec. In June it was working fine, along comes Braverman and she's either incompetent or, as Sir Roger believes, has an agenda
And as I said - these events don't happen in isolation from all other events. It's a situation that's developed over years, not the last 24 hours.
As I've said, in June it was working fine, along comes Braverman and she's either incompetent or, as Sir Roger believes, has an agenda
Braverman has written a 7 page letter.... Who does that? I remember TFSW reading out his letter when Sir Alex got under his skin ... I wonder if she's typed out "I'm as thick as ****" several thousand times
Just what the guardian are reporting mate, as per the number 10 briefing today. It would be quite easy to verify, one way or the tbh. They are stating now that all info in was in the public domain. Whereas under Truss journos reported it was market sensitive data. I am just trying to bring an update on her troubles. I am not a supporter of her. I just have a dislike of false info not being corrected as I dont think it helps anyone. As for the other documents apparently she only did it so she could read it between meetings or something . By all accounts that is allowable... I have always had a doubt about this story really. I have sent very sensitive info to someone I shouldnt have. I corrected my mistake in the same way she did. I appreciate I am not in government, but it has all felt a bit of a bigger fuss than was needed. I tend to think if we werent in this climate of witch hunting, which is earned by the tories of course, this would have been dealt with differently in the media. Like I say what she may or may not have done on these hotel approvals seems a bigger story, but that is just my opinion mate.
Sorry, haven't read all that, just stating what Sir Roger said on the bbc this morning. Wonder if he has an agenda? We'll find out soon at Home Sec question in the House of Commons
